Harriot, Thomas, Mss. 6785

List of thumbnails

< >
211
211 (106)
212
212 (106v)
213
213 (107)
214
214 (107v)
215
215 (108)
216
216 (108v)
217
217 (109)
218
218 (109v)
219
219 (110)
220
220 (110v)
< >
page |< < (145) of 882 > >|
289145
[Commentary:
Harriot refers to Euclid, .
If, as a whole is to a whole, so is a part subtracted to a part subtracted, the remainder will also be to the remainder as whole to whole. ]
Of 3 magnitudes in continuall proportion: there differences being
given; to find the
ffirst let us seeke out the theoreme delivering the proper
effection whereby it should be performed, by
The planes of the proportionalles
being noted, let the difference
betwixt the first & second be
called b: & betwixt the second &
third c
Then suppose the first proportionall to be a. then the second
wilbe a+b. &amp the third a+b+c
Now seing the square of the second is æquall to the oblong
of the extremes. let the multiplications be performed
as here
Then according to the art
let the æquation be [???]
& it wilbe
The square of the first difference, is æquall to the obling, made of
the difference of the differences, & the first

or: The first difference is a meane proportionall betwixt the difference
of the differences &ampa; the first

Wherefour the rule is:
Square the first difference; & divide by the difference of the
differences, & the quotient wilbe the first proportionall
The second & third proportionalls are threfour known by their
What proportion therefore in Euclide wilbe the element whereby to demonstrate
the problem by composition is easily manifest. that is to say, the 19th of the 5th.

From it will issue these two
If these be 3 magnitudes in continuall proportion; as the first hath
to the second; so hath the first difference, to the second

And: The first difference is a meane proportionall
betwixt the first proportionall & the difference of

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index