Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso
,
De motionibus naturalibus a gravitate pendentibus
,
1670
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 579
>
Scan
Original
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 579
>
page
|<
<
of 579
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001127
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
219
"
xlink:href
="
010/01/227.jpg
"/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg291
"/>
<
lb
/>
dem viro clariſſimo adductæ, inquit
<
lb
/>
enim:
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Si ſegmentum IC mercurij ab ae
<
lb
/>
ris exterioris cylindro ſuſtinetur, igitur
<
expan
abbr
="
cũ
">cum</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
cylindrus exterior eamdem vim ſemper
<
lb
/>
habeat æqualem ſegmentum IC ſemper
<
lb
/>
ſustinet. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001128
">Sed hoc experimento repugnat,
<
lb
/>
nam ſi tantulum aeris antequàm demit
<
lb
/>
tatur mercurius in fiſtula relinquatur mer
<
lb
/>
curius deſcendet infra C; in C autem ſuſti
<
lb
/>
neri deberet ſi à cylindro aeris exterioris
<
lb
/>
ſuſtineretur vt patet &c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.010.01.227.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
010/01/227/1.jpg
"
number
="
88
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg292
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.001129
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg291
"/>
Cap. 5. de ae
<
lb
/>
ris grauitate
<
lb
/>
æquilibrio,
<
lb
/>
ſtructura, &
<
lb
/>
vi elaterią
<
lb
/>
eius.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.001130
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg292
"/>
Tertium ar
<
lb
/>
gumentum
<
lb
/>
eiuſdem au
<
lb
/>
thoris.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001131
">Non latuit huius argumenti authorem reſponſio à
<
lb
/>
fautoribus contrariæ ſententiæ allata, nimirùm
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
illud
<
lb
/>
tantulum aeris infra fiſtulam relicti poſt deſcenſum mer
<
lb
/>
curij liberiorem nanciſci campum, ac proindè cum ante com
<
lb
/>
preſſus eſſet explicare ſeſe, ac dilatare, & premere ſuperfi
<
lb
/>
ciem mercurij, vnde hic infra C deſcendit.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001132
"> Sed inſtat di
<
lb
/>
cendo;
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
tantam aeris compresſionem iam ſupra ſatis effi
<
lb
/>
cacitèr ab ipſo refutatam fuiſſe.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001133
">Sed an reuerà iure refutata fuerit, poſteriùs
<
expan
abbr
="
oſtẽ-demus
">oſten
<
lb
/>
demus</
expan
>
, modò tantam aeris dilatationem argumento
<
lb
/>
ab eadem experientia deducto retinebimus;
<
expan
abbr
="
attamẽ
">attamen</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
interea erit operæpretium exponere quomodò, &
<
lb
/>
quando aer intra mercurium in fiſtula relictus expli
<
lb
/>
cetur dilateturque. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
figure
id
="
id.010.01.227.2.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
010/01/227/2.jpg
"
number
="
89
"/>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>