Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso, De motionibus naturalibus a gravitate pendentibus, 1670

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
< >
page |< < of 579 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000777">
                <pb pagenum="155" xlink:href="010/01/163.jpg"/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg195"/>
                <lb/>
              inuicem conantur recedere; quare ratione motus
                <lb/>
              aqua inferiùs, & poſticè recurrens non impellet
                <expan abbr="oleũ">oleum</expan>
                <lb/>
              ictum fugiens, nec proindè eius figuram AHC
                <expan abbr="cõ-tundere">con­
                  <lb/>
                tundere</expan>
              , & explanare poteſt. </s>
              <s id="s.000778">Igitur in hoc caſu duo
                <lb/>
              impetus inter ſe contrarij, & ab inuicem receden­
                <lb/>
              tes reperiuntur leuitatis olei, nimirùm, ſursùm ab H
                <lb/>
              versùs E, aquæ verò conatus inferiùs tendentis ab
                <lb/>
              H versùs I, igitur hæc duo corpora oleum AHCB,
                <lb/>
              & aqua ſubiecta MACK ſe mutuò tantummodò tan­
                <lb/>
              gent placidiſſimo amplexu abſque vlla pugna, & re­
                <lb/>
              pulſu, vt nimirùm aqua oleum non impellat, neque
                <lb/>
              hoc illam repellat, igitur oleum ABCH multò minùs
                <lb/>
              comprimi, ac contundi debetin H ab aqua ſubie­
                <lb/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg196"/>
                <lb/>
              cta deorsùm premente, quàm contundebatur poſticè
                <lb/>
              ab oleo incumbente, quando nimirum intra oleum̨
                <lb/>
              deſcendebat, & pondus eiuſdem olei incumbentis
                <lb/>
              patiebatur (in vtroque enim caſu recurſus fluidi ad
                <lb/>
              ſpatium replendum æquè reperitur, & proindè ne­
                <lb/>
              que nocet, neque adiuuat prædictum effectum) ſed
                <lb/>
              ex antepræmiſſa propoſitione aqua per oleum deci­
                <lb/>
              dens à vi natiua grauitatis impulſa retinet tumorem
                <lb/>
              eleuationemque
                <expan abbr="cõuexam">conuexam</expan>
              in poſtica parte eius mo­
                <lb/>
              tus, igitur multò magis eleuari deberet tumor iņ
                <lb/>
              oleo per aquam aſcendente in parte poſteriore mo­
                <lb/>
              tus eius ſi ab intrinſeca leuitate eleuaretur, qua pro­
                <lb/>
              ptèr erit omninò impoſſibile, vt oleum, vel aer dum
                <lb/>
              aſcendit per aquam, excauetur in parte infima eius
                <lb/>
              baſis,
                <expan abbr="quãdo">quando</expan>
              nimirùm ſursùm fertur ab interno prin­
                <lb/>
              cipio leuitatis, quod demonſtrandum fuerat. </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum