Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso, De motionibus naturalibus a gravitate pendentibus, 1670

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
< >
page |< < of 579 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000818">
                <pb pagenum="162" xlink:href="010/01/170.jpg"/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg206"/>
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              tea.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000819"> Primò aio nil referre an moles aquæ ſit maior,
                <lb/>
              aut minor reſpectu olei, & aeris, ſed ſufficit vt gra­
                <lb/>
              uitas ſpecifica aquæ, multò maior ſit reſpectu aggre­
                <lb/>
              gati ex aere, & oleo, quàm reſpectu ſolius olei, ita­
                <lb/>
              que in caſu noſtro moles aquæ, ſiue magna, ſiue exi­
                <lb/>
              gua, in fiſtula poteſt comparari cum oleo tantùm, vel
                <lb/>
              cum aggregato ex oleo, & aere; modò ex Archime­
                <lb/>
              dis doctrina eadem aqua grauior eſt ſpecie aggre­
                <lb/>
              gato ex oleo & aere, quàm oleo ſolitario, & quò ma­
                <lb/>
              ior fuerit differentia grauitatum ſpecificarum, tantò
                <lb/>
              maior, cęteris paribus, eſt velocitas mobilis in fluido,
                <lb/>
              & hinc
                <expan abbr="cõſtat">conſtat</expan>
              quòd ea quæ adducta ſunt, vt maximè
                <lb/>
              abſurda
                <expan abbr="nedũ">nedum</expan>
              inconuenientia non ſunt, ſed è contrà
                <lb/>
              neceſſitate mechanica contingere debent. </s>
              <s id="s.000820">Poſtremæ
                <lb/>
              oppoſitioni, vbi ait:
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Nec denique dici poteſt coniunctum
                <lb/>
              ex oleo, & aere eſſe aliquid leuius, quàm aquæ alterum
                <expan abbr="tã-tum">tan­
                  <lb/>
                tum</expan>
              in eadem mole, ideoque aquam illud magis in grauita­
                <lb/>
              te excedere, quàm oleum ſeorsùm ſumptum, & proindè ci­
                <lb/>
              tiùs illius locum occupare velle; nam ſi non datur leuitas,
                <lb/>
              & particula aeris habet aliquid grauitatis potiùs ex illa, &
                <lb/>
              oleo factum est corpus grauius, quàm est ſolum oleum.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000821"> Et
                <lb/>
              hic nil aliud reſpondere poſſum, niſi quòd huiuſmo­
                <lb/>
              di ratiocinia condonari poſſunt ijs, qui in doctriną
                <lb/>
              Archimedis minimè verſati ſunt. </s>
              <s id="s.000822">Affertur enim, vt
                <lb/>
              abſurdum, quòd aggregatum ex oleo, & aere grauius
                <lb/>
              ſit abſolutè ſolo oleo, quod profectò non negatur, eſt
                <lb/>
              enim veriſſimum, ſed tamen animaduertendum eſt,
                <lb/>
              quod licèt prædictum aggregatum ex oleo, & aerę
                <lb/>
              grauitate abſoluta magis ponderet, quàm oleum per </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum