Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
111 99
112 100
113 101
114 102
115 103
116 104
117 105
118 106
119 107
120 108
121 109
122 110
123 111
124 112
125 113
126 114
127 115
128 116
129 117
130 118
131 119
132 120
133 121
134 122
135 123
136 124
137 126
138 127
139 126
140 128
< >
page |< < (73) of 370 > >|
That the Moon may be a World.
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div type="section" level="1" n="36">
          <pb o="73" file="0085" n="85" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">4. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Becauſe Obſervation tells us, that the
              <lb/>
            ſpotted parts are always ſmooth, and equal,
              <lb/>
            having every where an equality of Light when
              <lb/>
            once they are enlightned by the Sun, whereas
              <lb/>
            the brighter parts are full of rugged Gibboſi-
              <lb/>
            ties and Mountains, having many Shades in
              <lb/>
            them, as I ſhall ſhew more at large afterwards.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">That in this Planet there muſt be Seas,
              <lb/>
            Campanella indeavours to prove out of Scrip-
              <lb/>
            ture, interpreting the Waters above the Firma-
              <lb/>
              <anchor type="note" xlink:label="note-0085-01a" xlink:href="note-0085-01"/>
            ment ſpoken in Geneſis, to be meant of the Sea
              <lb/>
            in this World. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">For (ſaith he) ’tis not likely
              <lb/>
            that there are any ſuch waters above the
              <lb/>
            Orbs to moderate that Heat which they re-
              <lb/>
            ceive from their ſwift Motion (as ſome of the
              <lb/>
            Fathers think.) </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Nor did Moſes mean the An-
              <lb/>
              <anchor type="note" xlink:label="note-0085-02a" xlink:href="note-0085-02"/>
            gels which may be called Spiritual Waters, as
              <lb/>
            Origen and Auſtin would have it, for both theſe
              <lb/>
            are rejected by general conſent: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Nor could
              <lb/>
            he mean any Waters in the ſecond Region, as
              <lb/>
            moſt Commentators interpret it: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">For firſt,
              <lb/>
            there is nothing but Vapors, which tho’ they
              <lb/>
            are afterwards turned into Water, yet while
              <lb/>
            they remain there, they are only the matter
              <lb/>
            of that Element, which may as well be Fire,
              <lb/>
            or Earth, or Air. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Secondly, thoſe Vapours
              <lb/>
            are not above the Expanſum, but in it. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">So that
              <lb/>
            he thinks there is no other way to ſalve all,
              <lb/>
            but by making the Planets ſeveral Worlds with
              <lb/>
            Sea and Land, with ſuch Rivers and Springs
              <lb/>
            as we have here below: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Eſpecially ſince Eſdras
              <lb/>
              <anchor type="note" xlink:label="note-0085-03a" xlink:href="note-0085-03"/>
            ſpeaks of the Springs above the Firmament.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">But I cannot agree with him in this, nor do I
              <lb/>
            think that any ſuch thing can be proved out of
              <lb/>
            Scripture.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <div type="float" level="2" n="7">
            <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0085-01" xlink:href="note-0085-01a" xml:space="preserve">Apologia pro
              <lb/>
            Galilæo.</note>
            <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0085-02" xlink:href="note-0085-02a" xml:space="preserve">Vide Iron.
              <lb/>
            Epiſt. ad
              <lb/>
            Pammachi-
              <lb/>
            um. Con-
              <lb/>
            feſſion. l. 13.
              <lb/>
            c. 32. Re-
              <lb/>
            tracted. lib.
              <lb/>
            2. Retr.
              <lb/>
            cap. 6.</note>
            <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0085-03" xlink:href="note-0085-03a" xml:space="preserve">2 Eſdr. 4.7</note>
          </div>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>