Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/135.jpg
"
pagenum
="
117
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>It may, in caſe the Ship were incorruptible, but the
<
lb
/>
Ship decaying, the Navigation muſt of neceſſity come to an end.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But in the Mediterrane, though the Veſſel were
<
lb
/>
ruptible, yet could ſhe not ſail perpetually towards
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Paleſtina,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg299
"/>
<
lb
/>
Voyage being determined. </
s
>
<
s
>Two things then are required, to the
<
lb
/>
end a moveable may without intermiſſion move perpetually; the
<
lb
/>
one is, that the motion may of its own nature be indeterminate and
<
lb
/>
infinite; the other, that the moveable be likewiſe incorruptible
<
lb
/>
and eternal.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg299
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Two things
<
lb
/>
quiſite to the end a
<
lb
/>
motion may
<
lb
/>
petuate it ſelf; an
<
lb
/>
unlimited ſpace,
<
lb
/>
and an
<
lb
/>
ble moveable.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>All this is neceſſary.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore you may ſee how of your own accord you
<
lb
/>
have confeſſed it impoſſible that any moveable ſhould move
<
lb
/>
nally in a right line, in regard that right motion, whether it be
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg300
"/>
<
lb
/>
wards, or downwards, is by you your ſelf bounded by the
<
lb
/>
ference and centre; ſo that if a Moveable, as ſuppoſe the Earth
<
lb
/>
be eternal, yet foraſmuch as the right motion is not of its own
<
lb
/>
ture eternall, but moſt ^{*}terminate, it cannot naturally ſuit with
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg301
"/>
<
lb
/>
the Earth. </
s
>
<
s
>Nay, as was ſaid ^{*} yeſterday,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
himſelf is
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg302
"/>
<
lb
/>
conſtrained to make the Terreſtrial Globe eternally immoveable.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>When again you ſay, that the parts of the Earth evermore move
<
lb
/>
downwards, all impediments being removed, you egregiouſly
<
lb
/>
vocate; for then, on the other ſide they muſt be impeded,
<
lb
/>
ried, and forced, if you would have them move; for, when they
<
lb
/>
are once fallen to the ground, they muſt be violently thrown
<
lb
/>
wards, that they may a ſecond time fall; and as to the
<
lb
/>
ments, theſe only hinder its arrival at the centre; but if there were
<
lb
/>
a
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Well,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that did paſſe thorow and beyond the centre, yet would not
<
lb
/>
a clod of Earth paſſe beyond it, unleſſe inaſmuch as being
<
lb
/>
ported by its
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
impetus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
it ſhould paſſe the ſame to return thither
<
lb
/>
gain, and in the end there to reſt. </
s
>
<
s
>As therefore to the defending,
<
lb
/>
that the motion by a right line doth or can agree naturally neither
<
lb
/>
to the Earth, nor to any other moveable, whil'ſt the Univerſe
<
lb
/>
taineth its perfect order, I would have you take no further paines
<
lb
/>
bout it, but (unleſſe you will grant them the circular motion)
<
lb
/>
your beſt way will be to defend and maintain their immobility.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg300
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Right motion
<
lb
/>
cannot be eternal,
<
lb
/>
and conſequently
<
lb
/>
cannot be natural
<
lb
/>
to the Earth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg301
"/>
* Terminatiſſimo.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg302
"/>
* By this
<
lb
/>
on he every where
<
lb
/>
means the
<
lb
/>
ding Dialogue, or
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Giornata.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>As to their immoveableneſſe, the arguments of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and moreover thoſe alledged by your ſelf ſeem in my
<
lb
/>
on neceſſarily to conclude the ſame, as yet; and I conceive it will
<
lb
/>
be a hard matter to refute them.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Come we therefore to the ſecond Argument, which was,
<
lb
/>
That thoſe bodies, which we are aſſured do move circularly, have
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg303
"/>
<
lb
/>
more than one motion, unleſſe it be the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Primum Mobile
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and
<
lb
/>
therefore, if the Earth did move circularly, it ought to have two
<
lb
/>
motions; from which alterations would follow in the riſing and
<
lb
/>
ſetting of the Fixed Stars: Which effect is not perceived to enſue. </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>