Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
151 139
152 140
153 141
154 142
155 143
156 144
157 145
158 146
159 147
160 148
161 149
162 150
163 151
164 152
165 153
166 154
167 155
168 156
169 157
170 158
171 159
172 160
< >
page |< < (7) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div195" type="section" level="1" n="55">
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2577" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="7" file="0187" n="187" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            than others; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2578" xml:space="preserve">ſince Ariſtotle himſelf, and Pli-
            ny did deny this as well as they.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2579" xml:space="preserve"/>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2580" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer:</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2581" xml:space="preserve"/>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2582" xml:space="preserve">1. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2583" xml:space="preserve">If they did, yet this do’s make more
            to the preſent purpoſe: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2584" xml:space="preserve">For if ſuch great
            Scholars, who were ſo eminent for their
            knowledge in natural things, might yet not-
            withſtanding be groſly miſtaken in ſuch
            matters as are now evident and certain:
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2585" xml:space="preserve">Why then we have no reaſon to depend
            upon their aſſertions or Authorities, as if
            they were infallible.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2586" xml:space="preserve"/>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2587" xml:space="preserve">2. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2588" xml:space="preserve">Though theſe great Naturaliſts, for
            want of ſome experience were miſtaken in
            that Opinion, whileſt they thought no place
            was habitable but the temperate Zones; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2589" xml:space="preserve">yet
            it cannot be from hence inferred, that they
            denied the poſſibility of Antipodes: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2590" xml:space="preserve">Since theſe
            are ſuch Inhabitants as live oppoſite unto us
            in the other temperate Zone; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2591" xml:space="preserve">and ’twere an
            abſurd thing to imagin that thoſe who lived
            in different Zones, can be Antipodes to one a-
            nother; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2592" xml:space="preserve">and argues that a Man did not un-
            derſtand, or elſe had forgotten that common
            diſtinction in Geography, wherein the relation
            of the Worlds Inhabitants unto one another,
            are reckoned up under theſe three heads; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2593" xml:space="preserve">An-
            tæci, Periæci, and Antipodes. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2594" xml:space="preserve">But to let this
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2595" xml:space="preserve">’tis certain, that ſome of the Fathers did
            deny the being of any ſuch, upon other more
            abſurd grounds. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2596" xml:space="preserve">Now if ſuch as Chryfoſtom,
            Lactantius, &</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2597" xml:space="preserve">c. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2598" xml:space="preserve">who were noted for great
            Scholars, and ſuch too as flouriſhed in theſe
            latter times, when all human Learning </s>