Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
181 (1)
182 2
183 3
184 4
185 5
186 6
187 7
188 8
189 9
190 10
191 11
192 12
193 13
194 14
195 15
196 16
197 17
198 18
199 19
200 20
201 21
202 22
203 23
204 24
205 25
206 26
207 27
208 28
209 29
210 30
< >
page |< < (33) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div213" type="section" level="1" n="56">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2980" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="33" file="0213" n="213" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            with divers ſuch ſtories. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2981" xml:space="preserve">And 'tis ſcarce
              <lb/>
            credible, that this ſhould have been omitted
              <lb/>
            amongſt the reſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2982" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2983" xml:space="preserve">Nay, we have (as many gueſs) ſome
              <lb/>
            hints from prophane Antiquity, of the Mira-
              <lb/>
            cle wrought by Joſhua. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2984" xml:space="preserve">Unto which, ’tis
              <lb/>
            thought, the Ancients did allude, in the Fa-
              <lb/>
            ble of Phaëton, when the Sun was ſo irregu-
              <lb/>
            lar in his courſe, that he burnt ſome part of
              <lb/>
            the World. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2985" xml:space="preserve">And queſtionleſs then, this
              <lb/>
            whith hapned in later Times, would not
              <lb/>
            have been ſo wholly forgotten. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2986" xml:space="preserve">'Tis an Ar-
              <lb/>
            gument urged by Origen, That the
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0213-01" xlink:href="note-0213-01a" xml:space="preserve">* Tract it.
                <lb/>
              35. in Mat.</note>
            at our Saviour's Paſſion was not univerſal,
              <lb/>
            becauſe no prophane Author of thoſe times
              <lb/>
            mentions it. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2987" xml:space="preserve">Which Conſequence is the ve-
              <lb/>
            ry ſame with that which is urged in this
              <lb/>
            caſe: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2988" xml:space="preserve">But by the way, his Antecedent was
              <lb/>
            falſe, ſince Tertullian affirms, That it
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0213-02" xlink:href="note-0213-02a" xml:space="preserve">+ Apolog @.
                <lb/>
              cap. 21.</note>
            recorded among the Roman Annals.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2989" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2990" xml:space="preserve">Now, as for that ſtory in Herodotus, where
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0213-03" xlink:href="note-0213-03a" xml:space="preserve">Lib. 2. A.</note>
            after he had related the flight of Senacherib,
              <lb/>
            he tells us, how the Sun did, four times in
              <lb/>
            the ſpace of 10340 Years, invert his courſe,
              <lb/>
            and riſe in the Weſt; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2991" xml:space="preserve">which would ſeem ſo
              <lb/>
            unto other Nations, if he had only returned,
              <lb/>
            as many conclude, from this Scripture. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2992" xml:space="preserve">As
              <lb/>
            for this ſtory, (I ſay) it cannot well be ur-
              <lb/>
            ged as pertinent to the preſent buſineſs, be-
              <lb/>
            cauſe it ſeems to have reference unto Times
              <lb/>
            that never were.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2993" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2994" xml:space="preserve">So that all theſe things being well conſi-
              <lb/>
            dered, we ſhall find it more probable, </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>