Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/185.jpg
"
pagenum
="
167
"/>
the difference would be very ſmall; and in the ſalts, and
<
lb
/>
ons of grave bodies altogether imperceptible.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg358
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The anſwer to
<
lb
/>
the argument
<
lb
/>
ken from the flight
<
lb
/>
of birds contrary
<
lb
/>
to the motion of the
<
lb
/>
Earth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg359
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
An experiment
<
lb
/>
with which alone
<
lb
/>
is ſhewn the nullity
<
lb
/>
of all the
<
lb
/>
ons produced
<
lb
/>
gainst the motion
<
lb
/>
of the Earth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg360
"/>
* Tafaris,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
flyes.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Though it came not into my thoughts to make triall of
<
lb
/>
theſe obſervations, when I was at Sea, yet am I confident that they
<
lb
/>
will ſucceed in the ſame manner, as you have related; in
<
lb
/>
tion of which I remember that being in my Cabbin I have asked
<
lb
/>
an hundred times whether the Ship moved or ſtood ſtill; and
<
lb
/>
ſometimes I have imagined that it moved one way, when it ſteered
<
lb
/>
quite another way. </
s
>
<
s
>I am therefore as hitherto ſatisfied and
<
lb
/>
vinced of the nullity of all thoſe experiments that have been
<
lb
/>
duced in proof of the negative part. </
s
>
<
s
>There now remains the
<
lb
/>
jection founded upon that which experience ſhews us, namely, that
<
lb
/>
a ſwift
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vertigo
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
or whirling about hath a faculty to extrude and
<
lb
/>
diſperſe the matters adherent to the machine that turns round;
<
lb
/>
whereupon many were of opinion, and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
amongſt the reſt,
<
lb
/>
that if the Earth ſhould turn round with ſo great velocity, the
<
lb
/>
ſtones and creatures upon it ſhould be toſt into the Skie, and
<
lb
/>
that there could not be a morter ſtrong enough to faſten buildings
<
lb
/>
ſo to their foundations, but that they would likewiſe ſuffer a like
<
lb
/>
extruſion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Before I come to anſwer this objection, I cannot but
<
lb
/>
take notice of that which I have an hundred times obſerved, and
<
lb
/>
not without laughter, to come into the minds of moſt men ſo ſoon
<
lb
/>
as ever they hear mention made of this motion of the Earth, which
<
lb
/>
is believed by them ſo fixt and immoveable, that they not only
<
lb
/>
ver doubted of that reſt, but have ever ſtrongly believed that all
<
lb
/>
other men aſwell as they, have held it to be created immoveable,
<
lb
/>
and ſo to have continued through all ſucceeding ages: and being
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg361
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſetled in this perſwaſion, they ſtand amazed to hear that any one
<
lb
/>
ſhould grant it motion, as if, after that he had held it to be
<
lb
/>
veable, he had fondly thought it to commence its motion then
<
lb
/>
(and not till then) when
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pythagoras
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(or whoever elſe was the firſt
<
lb
/>
hinter of its mobility) ſaid that it did move. </
s
>
<
s
>Now that ſuch a
<
lb
/>
liſh conceit (I mean of thinking that thoſe who admit the motion
<
lb
/>
of the Earth, have firſt thought it to ſtand ſtill from its creation,
<
lb
/>
untill the time of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pythagoras,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and have onely made it moveable
<
lb
/>
after that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pythagor as
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
eſteemed it ſo) findeth a place in the mindes
<
lb
/>
of the vulgar, and men of ſhallow capacities, I do not much
<
lb
/>
der; but that ſuch perſons as
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſhould alſo
<
lb
/>
run into this childiſh miſtake, is to my thinking a more admirable
<
lb
/>
and unpardonable folly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg361
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The ſtupidity of
<
lb
/>
ſome that think the
<
lb
/>
Earth to have
<
lb
/>
gun to move, when
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Pythagoras
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
began
<
lb
/>
to affirme that it
<
lb
/>
did ſo.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>You believe then,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Salviatus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
thought, that
<
lb
/>
in his Diſputation he was to maintain the ſtability of the Earth
<
lb
/>
againſt ſuch perſons, as granting it to have been immoveable,
<
lb
/>
till the time of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pythagoras,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
did affirm it to have been but then </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>