Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/192.jpg
"
pagenum
="
174
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſaid ſo, and alſo confeſſe the reſt: and do now plainly
<
lb
/>
underſtand that the ſtone will not ſeparate from the Earth, for
<
lb
/>
that its receſſion in the beginning would be ſuch, and ſo ſmall,
<
lb
/>
that it is a thouſand times exceeded by the inclination which the
<
lb
/>
ſtone hath to move towards the centre of the Earth, which
<
lb
/>
tre in this caſe is alſo the centre of the wheel. </
s
>
<
s
>And indeed it muſt
<
lb
/>
be confeſſed that the ſtones, the living creatures, and the other
<
lb
/>
grave bodies cannot be extruded; but here again the lighter things
<
lb
/>
beget in me a new doubt, they having but a very weak propenſion
<
lb
/>
of deſcent towards the centre; ſo that there being wanting in
<
lb
/>
them that faculty of withdrawing from the ſuperficies, I ſee not,
<
lb
/>
but that they may be extruded; and you know the rule, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ad
<
lb
/>
deſtruendum ſufficit unum.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAVL. </
s
>
<
s
>We will alſo give you ſatisfaction in this. </
s
>
<
s
>Tell me
<
lb
/>
therefore in the firſt place, what you underſtand by light matters,
<
lb
/>
that is, whether you thereby mean things really ſo light, as that
<
lb
/>
they go upwards, or elſe not abſolutely light, but of ſo ſmall
<
lb
/>
vity, that though they deſcend downwards, it is but very ſlowly;
<
lb
/>
for if you mean the abſolutely light, I will be readier than your
<
lb
/>
ſelf to admit their extruſion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſpeak of the other ſort, ſuch as are feathers, wool,
<
lb
/>
ton, and the like; to lift up which every ſmall force ſufficeth:
<
lb
/>
yet nevertheleſſe we ſee they reſt on the Earth very quietly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>This pen, as it hath a natural propenſion to deſcend
<
lb
/>
wards the ſuperficies of the Earth, though it be very ſmall, yet I
<
lb
/>
muſt tell you that it ſufficeth to keep it from mounting upwards:
<
lb
/>
and this again is not unknown to you your ſelf; therefore tell me
<
lb
/>
if the pen were extruded by the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vertigo
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of the Earth, by what
<
lb
/>
line would it move?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>By the tangent in the point of ſeparation.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>And when it ſhould be to return, and re-unite it ſelf to
<
lb
/>
the Earth, by what line would it then move?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>By that which goeth from it to the centre of the
<
lb
/>
Earth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>So then here falls under our conſideration two
<
lb
/>
ons; one the motion of projection, which beginneth from the
<
lb
/>
point of contact, and proceedeth along the tangent; and the
<
lb
/>
ther the motion of inclination downwards, which beginneth from
<
lb
/>
the project it ſelf, and goeth by the ſecant towards the centre; and
<
lb
/>
if you deſire that the projection follow, it is neceſſary that the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
petus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
by the tangent overcome the inclination by the ſecant: is it
<
lb
/>
not ſo?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>So it ſeemeth to me.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But what is it that you think neceſſary in the motion
<
lb
/>
of the projicient, to make that it may prevail over that </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>