Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/193.jpg
"
pagenum
="
175
"/>
tion, from which enſueth the ſeparation and elongation of the
<
lb
/>
pen from the Earth?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I cannot tell.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. How, do you not know that? </
s
>
<
s
>The moveable is here
<
lb
/>
the ſame, that is, the ſame pen; now how can the ſame moveable
<
lb
/>
ſuperate and exceed it ſelf in motion?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I do not ſee how it can overcome or yield to it ſelf in
<
lb
/>
motion, unleſſe by moving one while faſter, and another while
<
lb
/>
ſlower.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>You ſee then, that you do know it. </
s
>
<
s
>If therefore the
<
lb
/>
projection of the pen ought to follow, and its motion by the
<
lb
/>
gent be to overcome its motion by the ſecant, what is it requiſite
<
lb
/>
that their velocities ſhould be?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>It is requiſite that the motion by the tangent be greater
<
lb
/>
than that other by the ſecant. </
s
>
<
s
>But wretch that I am! Is it not
<
lb
/>
only many thouſand times greater than the deſcending motion of
<
lb
/>
the pen, but than that of the ſtone? </
s
>
<
s
>And yet like a ſimple fellow
<
lb
/>
I had ſuffered my ſelf to be perſwaded, that ſtones could not be
<
lb
/>
extruded by the revolution of the Earth. </
s
>
<
s
>I do therefore revoke
<
lb
/>
my former ſentence, and ſay, that if the Earth ſhould move,
<
lb
/>
ſtones, Elephants, Towers, and whole Cities would of neceſſity be
<
lb
/>
toſt up into the Air; and becauſe that that doth not evene, I
<
lb
/>
clude that the Earth doth not move.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Softly
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
you go on ſo faſt, that I begin to be
<
lb
/>
more afraid for you, than for the pen. </
s
>
<
s
>Reſt a little, and obſerve what
<
lb
/>
I am going to ſpeap. </
s
>
<
s
>If for the reteining of the ſtone or pen
<
lb
/>
nexed to the Earths ſurface it were neceſſary that its motion of
<
lb
/>
deſcent were greater, or as much as the motion made by the
<
lb
/>
gent; you would have had reaſon to ſay, that it ought of neceſſity
<
lb
/>
to move as faſt, or faſter by the ſecant downwards, than by the
<
lb
/>
tangent Eaſtwards: But did not you tell me even now, that a
<
lb
/>
thouſand yards of diſtance by the tangent from the contact, do
<
lb
/>
remove hardly an inch from the circumference? </
s
>
<
s
>It is not
<
lb
/>
ent therefore that the motion by the tangent, which is the ſame
<
lb
/>
with that of the diurnall
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vertigo,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(or haſty revolution) be fimply
<
lb
/>
more ſwift than the motion by the ſecant, which is the ſame with
<
lb
/>
that of the pen in deſcending; but it is requiſite that the ſame be
<
lb
/>
ſo much more ſwift as that the time which ſufficeth for the pen
<
lb
/>
to move
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
v.g.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
a thouſand yards by the tangent, be inſufficient for
<
lb
/>
it to move one ſole inch by the ſecant. </
s
>
<
s
>The which I tell you ſhall
<
lb
/>
never be, though you ſhould make that motion never ſo ſwift,
<
lb
/>
and this never ſo ſlow.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>And why might not that by the tangent be ſo ſwift, as
<
lb
/>
not to give the pen time to return to the ſurface of the Earth?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Try whether you can ſtate the caſe in proper termes, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>