Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/200.jpg
"
pagenum
="
182
"/>
amongſt thoſe who know nothing thereof. </
s
>
<
s
>Now to ſhew you how
<
lb
/>
great their errour is who ſay, that a Sphere
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
v.g.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of braſſe, doth not
<
lb
/>
touch a plain
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
v.g.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of ſteel in one ſole point, Tell me what
<
lb
/>
ceipt you would entertain of one that ſhould conſtantly aver, that
<
lb
/>
the Sphere is not truly a Sphere.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg368
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The truth
<
lb
/>
ſometimes gaines
<
lb
/>
ſtrength by
<
lb
/>
tradiction.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I would eſteem him wholly devoid of reaſon.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>He is in the ſame caſe who ſaith that the material Sphere
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg369
"/>
<
lb
/>
doth not touch a plain, alſo material, in one onely point; for to
<
lb
/>
ſay this is the ſame, as to affirm that the Sphere is not a Sphere.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>And that this is true, tell me in what it is that you conſtitute the
<
lb
/>
Sphere to conſiſt, that is, what it is that maketh the Sphere differ
<
lb
/>
from all other ſolid bodies.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg369
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The sphere
<
lb
/>
though material,
<
lb
/>
toucheth the
<
lb
/>
rial plane but in
<
lb
/>
one point onely.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I believe that the eſſence of a Sphere conſiſteth in
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg370
"/>
<
lb
/>
ving all the right lines produced from its centre to the
<
lb
/>
rence, equal.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg370
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The definition of
<
lb
/>
the ſphere.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>So that, if thoſe lines ſhould not be equal, there ſame
<
lb
/>
ſolidity would be no longer a ſphere?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. True.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Go to; tell me whether you believe that amongſt the
<
lb
/>
many lines that may be drawn between two points, that may be
<
lb
/>
more than one right line onely.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>There can be but one.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But yet you underſtand that this onely right line ſhall
<
lb
/>
again of neceſſity be the ſhorteſt of them all?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I know it, and alſo have a demonſtration thereof,
<
lb
/>
duced by a great
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Peripatetick
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Philoſopher, and as I take it, if my
<
lb
/>
memory do not deceive me, he alledgeth it by way of reprehending
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that ſuppoſeth it as known, when it may be
<
lb
/>
ſtrated.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>This muſt needs be a great Mathematician, that knew
<
lb
/>
how to demonſtrate that which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
neither did, nor could
<
lb
/>
demonſtrate. </
s
>
<
s
>And if you remember his demonſtration, I would
<
lb
/>
gladly hear it: for I remember very well, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in his
<
lb
/>
Books,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
de Sphærà & Cylindro,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
placeth this Propoſition amongſt the
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Poſtulata
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and I verily believe that he thought it demonſtrated.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I think I ſhall remember it, for it is very eaſie and
<
lb
/>
ſhort.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>The diſgrace of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and the honour of this
<
lb
/>
loſopher ſhall be ſo much the greater.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I will deſcribe the Figure of it. </
s
>
<
s
>Between the points
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg371
"/>
<
lb
/>
A and B, [
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in Fig.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
5.] draw the right line A B, and the curve line
<
lb
/>
A C B, of which we will prove the right to be the ſhorter: and
<
lb
/>
the proof is this; take a point in the curve-line, which let be C,
<
lb
/>
and draw two other lines, A C and C B, which two lines together;
<
lb
/>
are longer than the ſole line A B, for ſo demonſtrateth
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Euelid.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>