Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/236.jpg
"
pagenum
="
218
"/>
differs in ſpecies from a right motion? </
s
>
<
s
>If it be violent, how is it
<
lb
/>
that a fiery dart flying upwards, ſparkling over our heads at a
<
lb
/>
ſtance from the Earth, but not turning about,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg420
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg420
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Of the mixt
<
lb
/>
tion we ſee not the
<
lb
/>
part that is
<
lb
/>
lar, becauſe we
<
lb
/>
partake thereof.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>It hath been ſaid already very often, that the circular
<
lb
/>
motion is natural to the whole, and to its parts, whilſt they are in
<
lb
/>
perfect diſpoſure, and the right is to reduce to order the parts
<
lb
/>
diſordered; though indeed it is better to ſay, that neither the
<
lb
/>
parts ordered or diſordered ever move with a right motion, but
<
lb
/>
with one mixed, which might as well be averred meerly circular:
<
lb
/>
but to us but one part onely of this motion is viſible and
<
lb
/>
vable, that is, the part of the right, the other part of the circular
<
lb
/>
being imperceptible to us, becauſe we partake thereof. </
s
>
<
s
>And this
<
lb
/>
anſwers to the rays which move upwards, and round about, but we
<
lb
/>
cannot diſtinguiſh their circular motion, for that, with that we our
<
lb
/>
ſelves move alſo. </
s
>
<
s
>But I believe that this Author never thought
<
lb
/>
of this mixture; for you may ſee that he reſolutely ſaith, that the
<
lb
/>
rays go directly upwards, and not at all in gyration.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Quare centrum ſphære delapſæ ſub Æquatore ſpiram
<
lb
/>
ſcribit in ejus plano: ſub aliis parallelis ſpiram deſcribit in cono?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>ſub Polo deſcendit in axe lineam gyralem, decurrens in ſuperficie
<
lb
/>
cylindricâ conſignatam
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
? (In Engliſh to this purpoſe:) Why doth
<
lb
/>
the centre of a falling Globe under the Æquinoctial deſcribe a
<
lb
/>
ſpiral line in the plane of the Æquator; and in other parallels
<
lb
/>
a ſpiral about a Cone; and under the Pole deſcend in the
<
lb
/>
axis deſcribing a gyral line, running in a Cylindrical
<
lb
/>
cies?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Becauſe of the lines drawn from the Centre to the
<
lb
/>
cumference of the ſphere, which are thoſe by which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
graves
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
fcend, that which terminates in the Æquinoctial deſigneth a
<
lb
/>
cle, and thoſe that terminate in other parallels deſcribe conical
<
lb
/>
ſuperficies; now the axis deſcribeth nothing at all, but continueth
<
lb
/>
in its own being. </
s
>
<
s
>And if I may give you my judgment freely, I
<
lb
/>
will ſay, that I cannot draw from all theſe Queries, any ſenſe that
<
lb
/>
interfereth with the motion of the Earth; for if I demand of this
<
lb
/>
Author, (granting him that the Earth doth not move) what would
<
lb
/>
follow in all theſe particulars, ſuppoſing that it do move, as
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
pernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will have it; I am very confident, that he would ſay that
<
lb
/>
all theſe effects would happen, that he hath objected, as
<
lb
/>
niences to diſprove its mobility: ſo that in this mans opinion
<
lb
/>
ceſſary conſequences are accounted abſurdities: but I beſeech
<
lb
/>
you, if there be any more, diſpatch them, and free us ſpeedily
<
lb
/>
from this weariſom task.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>In this which follows he oppoſes
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
& his Sectators,
<
lb
/>
who affirm, that the motion of the parts ſeparated from their whole,
<
lb
/>
is onely to unite themſelves to their whole; but that the moving </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>