Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
191 11
192 12
193 13
194 14
195 15
196 16
197 17
198 18
199 19
200 20
201 21
202 22
203 23
204 24
205 25
206 26
207 27
208 28
209 29
210 30
211 31
212 32
213 33
214 34
215 35
216 36
217 37
218 38
219 39
220 40
< >
page |< < (44) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div225" type="section" level="1" n="57">
          <pb o="44" file="0224" n="224" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3150" xml:space="preserve">2. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3151" xml:space="preserve">The proportion of the Diameter to
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-01" xlink:href="note-0224-01a" xml:space="preserve">Roff. Ibid.</note>
            the Circumference, is not exactly the ſame
              <lb/>
            as ſeven to two and twenty, but rather leſs.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3152" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer, Though it be, yet ’tis nearer un-
              <lb/>
            to that, than any other number.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3153" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3154" xml:space="preserve">3. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3155" xml:space="preserve">The Scripture does but according to its
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-02" xlink:href="note-0224-02a" xml:space="preserve">Ibid.</note>
            uſual cuſtom, ſuppreſs the leſs number, and
              <lb/>
            mention only that which is bigger and more
              <lb/>
            full. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3156" xml:space="preserve">So in ſome places, Abraham’s
              <note symbol="*" position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-03" xlink:href="note-0224-03a" xml:space="preserve">Gen. 15.</note>
            ſterity is ſaid to remain in the Land of
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-04" xlink:href="note-0224-04a" xml:space="preserve">13.
                <lb/>
              Acts 7. 6.</note>
            Egypt for four hundred Years; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3157" xml:space="preserve">when as not-
              <lb/>
            withſtanding other Scriptures tell us,
              <note symbol="" position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-05" xlink:href="note-0224-05a" xml:space="preserve">Exod. 12.</note>
            they tarried there thirty Years longer. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3158" xml:space="preserve">Thus
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-06" xlink:href="note-0224-06a" xml:space="preserve">41.
                <lb/>
              Gal. 3. 17.</note>
            likewiſe in one place, the number of Ja- cob’s Houſe, who came into Egypt, is rec-
              <lb/>
              <note symbol="*" position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-07" xlink:href="note-0224-07a" xml:space="preserve">Gen. 46.
                <lb/>
              27.</note>
            koned to be ſeventy; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3159" xml:space="preserve">whereas
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-08" xlink:href="note-0224-08a" xml:space="preserve">† Act. 7. 4</note>
            they are ſaid to be ſeventy five.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3160" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3161" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3162" xml:space="preserve">All this is ſo ſar from deſtroy-
              <lb/>
            ing the force of the preſent Argument, that
              <lb/>
            it does rather confirm it, and more clearly
              <lb/>
            evidence unto us, that the Scripture does
              <lb/>
            not only, not ſpeak exactly in theſe ſubtil
              <lb/>
            and more ſecret Points of Philoſophy, but
              <lb/>
            alſo, in the ordinary obvious numbring of
              <lb/>
            things, does conform unto common cuſtom,
              <lb/>
            and often uſe the round number for the
              <lb/>
            whole.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3163" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3164" xml:space="preserve">4. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3165" xml:space="preserve">’Tis yet objected by another
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0224-09" xlink:href="note-0224-09a" xml:space="preserve">† Fro-
                <lb/>
              mond. Ve
                <lb/>
              ſta. @, t a.
                <lb/>
              3. c. 2.</note>
            ſary, That we have no reaſon to expect, the
              <lb/>
            Holy Ghoſt ſhould reveal unto us this Se-
              <lb/>
            cret in Nature, becauſe neither Archimedes,
              <lb/>
            nor any other, had then found it out. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3166" xml:space="preserve">I
              <lb/>
            reply, and why then ſhould we think that the
              <lb/>
            Scripture muſt needs inform us of the </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>