Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/250.jpg
"
pagenum
="
232
"/>
makes the objection, yea, it is totally overthrown by that which
<
lb
/>
immediately after he addeth for a greater confirmation of his
<
lb
/>
ment, as you ſhall hear. </
s
>
<
s
>He re-inforceth his argument, I ſay, with
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg451
"/>
<
lb
/>
another Axiome, which is this; That
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
natura in rebus neceſſari is
<
lb
/>
nec deficiat, nec abundat: i.e.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
That nature in things neceſſary is
<
lb
/>
neither defective, nor ſuperfluous. </
s
>
<
s
>This is obvious to the
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg452
"/>
<
lb
/>
vers of natural things, and chiefly of animals, in which, becauſe
<
lb
/>
they are to move with many motions, Nature hath made many
<
lb
/>
flexures, and hath thereunto commodiouſly knitted the parts for
<
lb
/>
motion, as to the knees, to the hips, for the inabling of living
<
lb
/>
creatures to go, and run at their pleaſure. </
s
>
<
s
>Moreover in man he
<
lb
/>
hath framed many flexions, and joynts, in the elbow, and hand, to
<
lb
/>
enable them to perform many motions. </
s
>
<
s
>From theſe things the
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg453
"/>
<
lb
/>
gument is taken againſt the threefold motion of the Earth. [
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ther the Body, that is one, and continuate, without any manner of
<
lb
/>
knittings or flexions, can exerciſe divers motions, or cannot: If it
<
lb
/>
can without them, then in vain hath nature framed the flexures in
<
lb
/>
animals; which is contrary to the Axiome: but if it cannot
<
lb
/>
out them, then the Earth, one body, and continuate, and deprived of
<
lb
/>
flexures, and joynts, cannot of its own nature move with
<
lb
/>
ty of motions.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
] You ſee now how craftily he falls upon your an
<
lb
/>
ſwer, as if he had foreſeen it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg451
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A fourth
<
lb
/>
iome againſt the
<
lb
/>
motion of the Earth
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg452
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Flexures
<
lb
/>
ſary in animals for
<
lb
/>
the diverſity of
<
lb
/>
their motions.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg453
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Another
<
lb
/>
ment againſt the
<
lb
/>
three fold motion of
<
lb
/>
the Earth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Are you ſerious, or do you jeſt?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſpeak it with the beſt judgment I have.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>You muſt therefore ſee that you have as fortunate an
<
lb
/>
hand in defending the reply of this Philoſopher, againſt ſome
<
lb
/>
ther rejoynders made to him; therefore anſwer for him, I pray
<
lb
/>
you, ſeeing we cannot have him here. </
s
>
<
s
>You firſt admit it for true,
<
lb
/>
that Nature hath made the joynts, flexures, and knuckles of
<
lb
/>
ving creatures, to the intent that they might move with ſnndry
<
lb
/>
and divers motions; and I deny this propoſition; and ſay, that
<
lb
/>
theſe flexions are made, that the animal may move one, or more
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg454
"/>
<
lb
/>
of its parts, the reſt remaining immoved: and I ſay, that as to the
<
lb
/>
ſpecies and differences of motions thoſe are of one kind alone, to
<
lb
/>
wit, all circular, and for this cauſe you ſee all the ends of the
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg455
"/>
<
lb
/>
veable bones to be convex or concave, and of theſe ſome are
<
lb
/>
rical, as are thoſe that are to move every way, as in the
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg456
"/>
<
lb
/>
joynt, the arme of the Enſigne doth, in diſplaying the Colours,
<
lb
/>
and that of the Falconer in bringing his Hawk to the lure; and
<
lb
/>
ſuch is the flexure of the elbow, upon which the hand turns round,
<
lb
/>
in boring with an augure: others are circular onely one way, and
<
lb
/>
as it were cylindrical, which ſerve for the members that bend
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg457
"/>
<
lb
/>
ly in one faſhion, as the joynts of the fingers one above another,
<
lb
/>
&c. </
s
>
<
s
>But without more particular inductions, one only general
<
lb
/>
courſe may make this truth underſtood; and this is, that of a ſolid </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>