Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/254.jpg
"
pagenum
="
236
"/>
diſſenteth from the doctrine of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
As again,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg468
"/>
<
lb
/>
to this third motion, which the Author aſſignes to the Terreſtrial
<
lb
/>
Globe, as the judgment of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
I know not which he would
<
lb
/>
mean thereby: it is not that queſtionleſſe, which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
cribes unto it conjunctly with the other two, annual and diurnal,
<
lb
/>
which hath nothing to do with declining towards the South and
<
lb
/>
North; but onely ſerveth to keep the axis of the diurnal
<
lb
/>
on continually parallel to it ſelf; ſo that it muſt be confeſt, that
<
lb
/>
either the Authour did not underſtand this, or that elſe he
<
lb
/>
bled it. </
s
>
<
s
>But although this great miſtake ſufficeth to free us from
<
lb
/>
any obligation of a farther enquiry into his objections; yet
<
lb
/>
vertheleſſe I ſhall have them in eſteem; as indeed they deſerve to
<
lb
/>
be valued much before the many others of impertinent
<
lb
/>
niſts. </
s
>
<
s
>Returning therefore to his objection, I ſay, that the two
<
lb
/>
motions, annual and diurnal, are not in the leaſt contrary, nay are
<
lb
/>
towards the ſame way, and therefore may depend on one and the
<
lb
/>
ſame principle. </
s
>
<
s
>The third is of it ſelf, and voluntarily ſo
<
lb
/>
tial to the annual, that we need not trouble our ſelves (as I ſhall
<
lb
/>
ſhew in its place) to ſtudy for principles either internal or external,
<
lb
/>
from which, as from its cauſe, to make it produced.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg467
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By another
<
lb
/>
error it is ſeen that
<
lb
/>
the Antagoniſt had
<
lb
/>
but little ſtudied
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Copernicus.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg468
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
It is queſtioned,
<
lb
/>
whether the
<
lb
/>
nent underſtood
<
lb
/>
the third motion
<
lb
/>
aſſigned to the
<
lb
/>
Earth by
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
cus.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſhall alſo, as being induced thereto by natural reaſon,
<
lb
/>
ſay ſomething to this Antagoniſt. </
s
>
<
s
>He will condemn
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
unleſſe I be able to anſwer him to all objections, and to ſatisfie
<
lb
/>
him in all queſtions he ſhall ask; as if my ignorance were a
<
lb
/>
ſary argument of the falſhood of his Doctrine. </
s
>
<
s
>But if this way of
<
lb
/>
condemning Writers be in his judgment legal, he ought not to
<
lb
/>
think it unreaſonable, if I ſhould not approve of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Arîſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
lomy,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
when he cannot reſolve, better than my ſelf, thoſe doubts
<
lb
/>
which I propound to him, touching their Doctrine. </
s
>
<
s
>He asketh me,
<
lb
/>
what are the principles by which the Terreſtrial Globe is moved
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg469
"/>
<
lb
/>
with the Annual motion through the Zodiack, and with the
<
lb
/>
nal through the Equinoctial about its own axis. </
s
>
<
s
>I anſwer, that
<
lb
/>
they are like to thoſe by which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Saturn
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is moved about the
<
lb
/>
ack in thirty years, and about its own centre in a much ſhorter
<
lb
/>
time along the Equinoctial, as the collateral apparition and
<
lb
/>
cultation of its Globes doth evince. </
s
>
<
s
>They are principles like to
<
lb
/>
thoſe, whereby he ſcrupleth not to grant, that the Sun runneth
<
lb
/>
row the Ecliptick in a year, and revolveth about its own centre
<
lb
/>
parallel to the Equinoctial in leſſe than a moneth, as its ſpots doth
<
lb
/>
ſenſibly demonſtrate. </
s
>
<
s
>They are things like to thoſe whereby the
<
lb
/>
Medicean Stars run through the Zodiack in twelve years, and
<
lb
/>
all the while revolve in ſmall circles, and ſhort periods of time
<
lb
/>
bout
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Jupiter.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg469
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The ſame
<
lb
/>
ment anſwered by
<
lb
/>
examples of the
<
lb
/>
like motions in
<
lb
/>
ther cœleſtial
<
lb
/>
dies.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>This Author will deny all theſe things, as deluſions of
<
lb
/>
the fight, cauſed by the cryſtals of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Teleſcope.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>