Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/256.jpg
"
pagenum
="
238
"/>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg473
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The diverſity of
<
lb
/>
motions helpeth us
<
lb
/>
in knowing the
<
lb
/>
verſity of natures.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I have twice or thrice obſerved in the diſcourſes of this
<
lb
/>
Authour, that to prove that a thing is ſo, or ſo, he ſtill alledgeth,
<
lb
/>
that in that manner it is conformable with our underſtanding; or
<
lb
/>
that otherwiſe we ſhould never be able to conceive of it; or that
<
lb
/>
the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Criterium
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of Philoſophy would be overthrown. </
s
>
<
s
>As if that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg474
"/>
<
lb
/>
ture had firſt made mens brains, and then diſpoſed all things in
<
lb
/>
conformity to the capacity of their intellects. </
s
>
<
s
>But I incline rather
<
lb
/>
to think that Nature firſt made the things themſelves, as ſhe beſt
<
lb
/>
liked, and afterwards framed the reaſon of men capable of
<
lb
/>
ceiving (though not without great pains) ſome part of her
<
lb
/>
crets.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg474
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Nature firſt
<
lb
/>
made things as ſhe
<
lb
/>
pleaſed, and
<
lb
/>
wards capacitated
<
lb
/>
mens
<
lb
/>
ings for conceiving
<
lb
/>
of them.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I am of the ſame opinion. </
s
>
<
s
>But tell me,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
which are theſe different natures, to which, contrary to
<
lb
/>
rience and reaſon,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
aſſignes the ſame motions and
<
lb
/>
rations.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>They are theſe. </
s
>
<
s
>The Water, the Air, (which
<
lb
/>
leſſe are Natures different from the Earth) and all things that
<
lb
/>
are in thoſe elements compriſed, ſhall each of them have thoſe
<
lb
/>
three motions, which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
pretends to be in the Terreſtriall
<
lb
/>
Globe; and my Authour proceedeth to demonſtrate
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg475
"/>
<
lb
/>
cally, that, according to the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernican
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Doctrine, a cloud that is
<
lb
/>
ſuſpended in the Air, and that hangeth a long time over our
<
lb
/>
heads without changing place, muſt of neceſſity have all thoſe three
<
lb
/>
motions that belong to the Terreſtrial Globe. </
s
>
<
s
>The
<
lb
/>
tion is this, which you may read your ſelf, for I cannot repeat it
<
lb
/>
without book.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg475
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
roneouſly aſſigneth
<
lb
/>
the ſame operations
<
lb
/>
to different natures
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſhall not ſtand reading of it, nay I think it an
<
lb
/>
tinency in him to have inſerted it, for I am certain, that no
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernican
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will deny the ſame. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore admitting him what he
<
lb
/>
would demonſtrate, let us ſpeak to the objection, which in my
<
lb
/>
judgment hath no great ſtrength to conclude any thing contrary
<
lb
/>
to the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernican Hypotheſis,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſeeing that it derogates nothing from
<
lb
/>
thoſe motions, and thoſe operations, whereby we come to the
<
lb
/>
knowledge of the natures, &c. </
s
>
<
s
>Anſwer me, I pray you,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
us:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Thoſe accidents wherein ſome things exactly concur, can
<
lb
/>
they ſerve to inform us of the different natures of thoſe
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg476
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg476
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
From commune
<
lb
/>
accidents one
<
lb
/>
not know different
<
lb
/>
natures.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>No Sir: nay rather the contrary, for from the idendity
<
lb
/>
of operations and of accidents nothing can be inferred, but an
<
lb
/>
idendity of natures.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>So that the different natures of the Water, Earth, Air,
<
lb
/>
and other things conteined in theſe Elements, is not by you
<
lb
/>
ed from thoſe operations, wherein all theſe Elements and their
<
lb
/>
fixes agree, but from other operations; is it ſo?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>The very ſame.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>So that he who ſhould leave in the Elements all thoſe </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>