Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/252.jpg
"
pagenum
="
234
"/>
produceth ſundry and divers motions in living creatures. </
s
>
<
s
>And as
<
lb
/>
to the flexures there is no need of them, the motions being of the
<
lb
/>
whole, and not of ſome particular parts; and becauſe they are
<
lb
/>
to be circular, the meer ſpherical figure is the moſt perfect
<
lb
/>
lation or flection that can be deſired.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg462
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
It is deſired to
<
lb
/>
know, by means of
<
lb
/>
what flexures and
<
lb
/>
joynts the
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſtrial Globe
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
might
<
lb
/>
move with three
<
lb
/>
diverſe motions.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg463
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
One only
<
lb
/>
ple may cauſe a
<
lb
/>
plurality of
<
lb
/>
ons in the Earth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>The moſt that ought to be granted upon this, would be,
<
lb
/>
that it may hold true in one ſingle motion, but in three different
<
lb
/>
motions, in my opinion, and that of the Author, it is
<
lb
/>
ble; as he going on, proſecuting the objection, writes in the
<
lb
/>
lowing words.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Let us ſuppoſe, with
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
that the Earth
<
lb
/>
moveth of its own faculty, and upon an intrinſick principle from
<
lb
/>
Weſt to Eaſt in the plane of the Ecliptick; and again, that it alſo
<
lb
/>
by an intrinſick principle revolveth about its centre, from Eaſt to
<
lb
/>
Weſt; and for a third motion, that it of its own inclination
<
lb
/>
cteth from North to South, and ſo back again.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
It being a
<
lb
/>
nuate body, and not knit together with joints and flections, our
<
lb
/>
fancy and our judgment will never be able to comprehend, that
<
lb
/>
one and the ſame natural and indiſtinct principle, that is, that
<
lb
/>
one and the ſame propenſion, ſhould actuate it at the ſame inſtant
<
lb
/>
with different, and as it were of contrary motions. </
s
>
<
s
>I cannot
<
lb
/>
lieve that any one would ſay ſuch a thing, unleſſe he had
<
lb
/>
took to maintain this poſition right or wrong.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Stay a little; and find me out this place in the Book.
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fingamus modo cum Copernico terram aliqua ſuâ vi, & ab indito
<
lb
/>
principio impelli ab Occaſu ad Ortum in Eclipticæ plano; tum
<
lb
/>
ſus revolvi ab indito etiam principio, circa ſuimet centrum, ab
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg464
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ortu in Occaſum; tertio deſlecti rurſus ſu opte nutu à
<
lb
/>
ne in Auſtrum, & viciſſim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
I had thought,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that
<
lb
/>
that you might have erred in reciting the words of the
<
lb
/>
thor, but now I ſee that he, and that very groſſely,
<
lb
/>
veth himſelf; and to my grief, I find that he hath ſet himſelf to
<
lb
/>
oppoſe a poſition, which he hath not well underſtood; for theſe
<
lb
/>
are not the motions which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
aſſignes to the Earth.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Where doth he find that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
maketh the annual motion
<
lb
/>
by the Ecliptick contrary to the motion about its own centre? </
s
>
<
s
>It
<
lb
/>
muſt needs be that he never read his Book, which in an hundred
<
lb
/>
places, and in the very firſt Chapters affirmeth thoſe motions to
<
lb
/>
be both towards the ſame parts, that is from Weſt to Eaſt.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>But without others telling him, ought he not of himſelf to
<
lb
/>
prehend, that attributing to the Earth the motions that are ta
<
lb
/>
ken, one of them from the Sun, and the other from the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
mum wobile,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
they muſt of neceſſity both move one and the ſame
<
lb
/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg465
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg464
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A groſſe error
<
lb
/>
of the oppoſer of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Copernicus.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg465
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A ſubtil and
<
lb
/>
withal ſimple
<
lb
/>
gument againſt
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Copernicus.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Take heed that you do not erre your ſelf, and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
cus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
alſo. </
s
>
<
s
>The Diurnal motion of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
primum mobile,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is it not from </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>