Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/280.jpg
"
pagenum
="
260
"/>
caſe is not to be ſuppoſed. </
s
>
<
s
>But becauſe (obſerve well) the diſtance
<
lb
/>
of the Firmament, in relation to the ſmallneſſe of the Earth, as
<
lb
/>
hath been ſaid, is to be accounted, as if it were infinite; therefore
<
lb
/>
the angle conteined betwixt the two rayes, that being drawn from
<
lb
/>
the points A and E, go to determine in a fixed Star, is eſteemed
<
lb
/>
nothing, and thoſe rayes held to be two parallel lines; and
<
lb
/>
fore it is concluded, that then only may the New Star be affirmed
<
lb
/>
to have been in the Firmament, when from the collating of the
<
lb
/>
Obſervations made in divers places, the ſaid angle is, by
<
lb
/>
tion, gathered to be inſenſible, and the lines, as it were, parallels.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>But if the angle be of a conſiderable quantity, the New Star muſt
<
lb
/>
of neceſſity be lower than thoſe fixed; and alſo than the Moon, in
<
lb
/>
caſe the angle A B E ſhould be greater than that which would be
<
lb
/>
made in the Moons centre.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Then the remoteneſſe of the Moon is not ſo great, that
<
lb
/>
a like angle ſhould be ^{*}inſenſible in
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg511
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg511
"/>
* Imperceptible.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>No Sir; nay it is ſenſible, not onely in the Moon, but
<
lb
/>
in the Sun alſo.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>But if this be ſo, it's poſſible that the ſaid angle may
<
lb
/>
be obſerved in the New Star, without neceſſitating it to be
<
lb
/>
our to the Sun, aſwell as to the Moon.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>This may very well be, yea, and is in the preſent caſe,
<
lb
/>
as you ſhall ſee in due place; that is, when I ſhall have made plain
<
lb
/>
the way, in ſuch manner that you alſo, though not very perfect in
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aſtronomical
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
calculations, may clearly ſee, and, as it were, with
<
lb
/>
your hands feel how that this Authour had it more in his eye to
<
lb
/>
write in complacency of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Peripateticks,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
by palliating and
<
lb
/>
ſembling ſundry things, than to eſtabliſh the truth, by producing
<
lb
/>
them with naked ſincerity: therefore let us proceed forwards. </
s
>
<
s
>By
<
lb
/>
the things hitherto ſpoken, I ſuppoſe that you comprehend very
<
lb
/>
well how that the diſtance of the new Star can never be
<
lb
/>
made ſo immenſe, that the angle ſo often named ſhall wholly
<
lb
/>
appear, and that the two rayes of the Obſervators at the places
<
lb
/>
A and E, ſhall become altogether parallels: and you may
<
lb
/>
quently comprehend to the full, that if the calculations ſhould
<
lb
/>
collect from the obſervations, that that angle was totally null, or
<
lb
/>
that the lines were truly parallels, we ſhould be certain that the
<
lb
/>
obſervations were at leaſt in ſome ſmall particular erroneous:
<
lb
/>
But, if the calculations ſhould give us the ſaid lines to be
<
lb
/>
ted not only to equidiſtance, that is, ſo as to be parallel, but to
<
lb
/>
have paſt beyond that terme, and to be dilated more above than
<
lb
/>
below, then muſt it be reſolutely concluded, that the obſervations
<
lb
/>
were made with leſſe accurateneſſe, and in a word, to be
<
lb
/>
ous; as leading us to a manifeſt impoſſibility. </
s
>
<
s
>In the next place,
<
lb
/>
you muſt believe me, and ſuppoſe it for true, that two right lines </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>