Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 701 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="040/01/280.jpg" pagenum="260"/>
              caſe is not to be ſuppoſed. </s>
              <s>But becauſe (obſerve well) the diſtance
                <lb/>
              of the Firmament, in relation to the ſmallneſſe of the Earth, as
                <lb/>
              hath been ſaid, is to be accounted, as if it were infinite; therefore
                <lb/>
              the angle conteined betwixt the two rayes, that being drawn from
                <lb/>
              the points A and E, go to determine in a fixed Star, is eſteemed
                <lb/>
              nothing, and thoſe rayes held to be two parallel lines; and
                <lb/>
              fore it is concluded, that then only may the New Star be affirmed
                <lb/>
              to have been in the Firmament, when from the collating of the
                <lb/>
              Obſervations made in divers places, the ſaid angle is, by
                <lb/>
              tion, gathered to be inſenſible, and the lines, as it were, parallels.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s>But if the angle be of a conſiderable quantity, the New Star muſt
                <lb/>
              of neceſſity be lower than thoſe fixed; and alſo than the Moon, in
                <lb/>
              caſe the angle A B E ſhould be greater than that which would be
                <lb/>
              made in the Moons centre.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMP. </s>
              <s>Then the remoteneſſe of the Moon is not ſo great, that
                <lb/>
              a like angle ſhould be ^{*}inſenſible in
                <lb/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg511"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="margin">
              <s>
                <margin.target id="marg511"/>
              * Imperceptible.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>No Sir; nay it is ſenſible, not onely in the Moon, but
                <lb/>
              in the Sun alſo.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMP. </s>
              <s>But if this be ſo, it's poſſible that the ſaid angle may
                <lb/>
              be obſerved in the New Star, without neceſſitating it to be
                <lb/>
              our to the Sun, aſwell as to the Moon.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>This may very well be, yea, and is in the preſent caſe,
                <lb/>
              as you ſhall ſee in due place; that is, when I ſhall have made plain
                <lb/>
              the way, in ſuch manner that you alſo, though not very perfect in
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Aſtronomical
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              calculations, may clearly ſee, and, as it were, with
                <lb/>
              your hands feel how that this Authour had it more in his eye to
                <lb/>
              write in complacency of the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Peripateticks,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              by palliating and
                <lb/>
              ſembling ſundry things, than to eſtabliſh the truth, by producing
                <lb/>
              them with naked ſincerity: therefore let us proceed forwards. </s>
              <s>By
                <lb/>
              the things hitherto ſpoken, I ſuppoſe that you comprehend very
                <lb/>
              well how that the diſtance of the new Star can never be
                <lb/>
              made ſo immenſe, that the angle ſo often named ſhall wholly
                <lb/>
              appear, and that the two rayes of the Obſervators at the places
                <lb/>
              A and E, ſhall become altogether parallels: and you may
                <lb/>
              quently comprehend to the full, that if the calculations ſhould
                <lb/>
              collect from the obſervations, that that angle was totally null, or
                <lb/>
              that the lines were truly parallels, we ſhould be certain that the
                <lb/>
              obſervations were at leaſt in ſome ſmall particular erroneous:
                <lb/>
              But, if the calculations ſhould give us the ſaid lines to be
                <lb/>
              ted not only to equidiſtance, that is, ſo as to be parallel, but to
                <lb/>
              have paſt beyond that terme, and to be dilated more above than
                <lb/>
              below, then muſt it be reſolutely concluded, that the obſervations
                <lb/>
              were made with leſſe accurateneſſe, and in a word, to be
                <lb/>
              ous; as leading us to a manifeſt impoſſibility. </s>
              <s>In the next place,
                <lb/>
              you muſt believe me, and ſuppoſe it for true, that two right lines </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>