Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
281 101
282 102
283 103
284 104
285 105
286 106
287 107
288 108
289 109
290 110
291 111
292 112
293 113
294 114
295 115
296 116
297 117
298 118
299 119
300 120
301 121
302 122
303 123
304 124
305 125
306 126
307 127
308 128
309 129
310 130
< >
page |< < (82) of 370 > >|
That the Earth may be a Planet.
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <pb o="82" file="0262" n="262" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">I anſwer: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Though Ariſtotle were a Maſter
              <lb/>
            in the Art of Syllogiſms, and he from whom
              <lb/>
            he received the Rules of Diſputation; </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">yet
              <lb/>
            in this particular, ’tis very plain that he
              <lb/>
            was deceived with a Fallacy, whilſt his Ar-
              <lb/>
            gument does but only ſuppoſe that which it
              <lb/>
            pretend to prove.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">That light Bodies do aſcend unto ſome
              <lb/>
            Circumſerence which is higher and above
              <lb/>
            the Earth, is plain and undeniable. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">But
              <lb/>
            that this Circumference is the ſame with that
              <lb/>
            of the World, or concentrical unto it, can-
              <lb/>
            not be reaſonably aſſirmed, unleſs he ſup-
              <lb/>
            poſes the Earth to be in the Centre of the
              <lb/>
            Univerſe, which is the thing to be pro-
              <lb/>
            ved.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">I would fain know from what grounds
              <lb/>
            our Adverſaries can prove, that the deſcent
              <lb/>
            of heavy Bodies is to the Centre; </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">or the
              <lb/>
            aſcent of light Bodies, to the Circumference
              <lb/>
            of the World. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">The utmoſt experience we
              <lb/>
            can have in this kind, does but extend to
              <lb/>
            thoſe things that are upon our Earth, or in
              <lb/>
            the Air above it. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">And alas, what is this
              <lb/>
            unto the vaſt frame of the whole Univerſe,
              <lb/>
            but punctulum, ſuch an inſenſible Point,
              <lb/>
            which does not bear ſo great a proportion
              <lb/>
            to the whole, as a ſmall Sand does unto the
              <lb/>
            Earth? </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Wherefore it were a ſenſleſs thing,
              <lb/>
            from our experience of ſo little a part, to
              <lb/>
            pronounce any thing inſallibly concerning
              <lb/>
            the ſcituation of the whole.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>