Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
301 121
302 122
303 123
304 124
305 125
306 126
307 127
308 128
309 129
310 130
311 131
312 132
313 133
314 134
315 135
316 136
317 137
318 138
319 139
320 140
321 141
322 142
323 143
324 144
325 145
326 146
327 147
328 148
329 149
330 150
< >
page |< < (97) of 370 > >|
That the Eartb may be a Planet.
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="97" file="0277" n="277" rhead="That the Eartb may be a Planet."/>
            ſtance from the Earth, and no nearer or far-
              <lb/>
            ther. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">And beſides, this Argument might as
              <lb/>
            well be urged againſt the Hypotheſis of Pto-
              <lb/>
            lomy or Tycbo, ſince the Stars, for ought
              <lb/>
            we know, might have been as ſerviceable to
              <lb/>
            us, if they had been placed far nearer than
              <lb/>
            either of thoſe Authors ſuppoſe them. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">A-
              <lb/>
            gain, were there any force in ſuch a Conſe-
              <lb/>
            quence, it would as well conclude a great
              <lb/>
            improvidence of Nature, in making ſuch a
              <lb/>
            multitude of thoſe leſſer Stars, which have
              <lb/>
            lately been diſcovered by the Perſpective.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">For to what purpoſe ſhould ſo many Lights
              <lb/>
            be created for the uſe of Man, ſince his Eyes
              <lb/>
            were not able to diſcern them? </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">So that our
              <lb/>
            diſability to comprehend all thoſe ends
              <lb/>
            which might be aimed at in the Works of
              <lb/>
            Nature, can be no ſufficient Argument to
              <lb/>
            prove their ſuperfluity. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Though Scripture
              <lb/>
            tells us, that theſe things were made for
              <lb/>
            our uſe, yet it does not tell us, that this is
              <lb/>
            their only end. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">’Tis not impoſſible, but that
              <lb/>
            there may be elſewhere ſome other Inhabi-
              <lb/>
            tants, by whom theſe leſſer Stars may be
              <lb/>
            more plainly diſcerned. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">And (as was ſaid
              <lb/>
            before) why may not we affirm that of the
              <lb/>
            bigneſs, which our Adverſaries do concern-
              <lb/>
            ing the motion of the Heavens? </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">That God,
              <lb/>
            to ſhew his own immenſity, did put a kind
              <lb/>
            of infinity in the Creature.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <div type="float" level="2" n="13">
            <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0276-01" xlink:href="note-0276-01a" xml:space="preserve">Eccl.8.17.</note>
          </div>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">There is yet another Argument to this
              <lb/>
            purpoſe, urged by
              <anchor type="note" xlink:href="" symbol="*"/>
            Al. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Roſſ. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">which was not
              <anchor type="note" xlink:label="note-0277-01a" xlink:href="note-0277-01"/>
            referred to any of the former kind, becauſe
              <lb/>
            I could ſcarcely believe I did rightly under-</s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>