Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
41 29
42 30
43 31
44 32
45 33
46 34
47 35
48 36
49 37
50 38
51 39
52 40
53 41
54 42
55 43
56 44
57 45
58 46
59 47
60 48
61 49
62 50
63 51
64 52
65 53
66 54
67 55
68 56
69 57
70 58
< >
page |< < (57) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div88" type="section" level="1" n="34">
            <s xml:id="echoid-s889" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="57" file="0069" n="69" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            logy for the ſtrangeneſs of thoſe Truths that
            he was there to deliver; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s890" xml:space="preserve">amongſt which, there
            are divers things to this purpoſe concerning
            the Nature of theMoon. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s891" xml:space="preserve">He profeſſes that
            he did not publiſh them, either out of a hu-
            mour oſ Contradiction, or deſire of Vain-glo-
            ry, or in a Jeſting way, to make himſelf, or
            others merry, but after a conſiderate and ſo-
            lemn manner, for the diſcovery of the Truth.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s892" xml:space="preserve"/>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s893" xml:space="preserve">Now as for the knowledge which Cæſar pre-
            tends to the contrary, you may gueſs what it
            was by his ſtrange conſidence in other Aſſerti-
            ons, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s894" xml:space="preserve">his boldneſs in them may well derogate
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0069-01" xlink:href="note-0069-01a" xml:space="preserve">cap. 7. </note>
            from his Credit in this. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s895" xml:space="preserve">For ſpeaking of Pto-
            lomy’s Hypotheſis, he pronounces this Verdict,
            Impoſſibile eſt excentricorum & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s896" xml:space="preserve">epicyclorum poſiti-
            tio, nec aliquis eſt ex Mathematicis adeo ſtultus
            qui veram illam exiſtimet. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s897" xml:space="preserve">‘The poſition of
            ‘ Excentricks and Epicycles is altogether im-
            ‘ poſſible, nor is there any Mathematician ſuch
            ‘ a Fool as to think it true. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s898" xml:space="preserve">I ſhould gueſs he
            could not have knowledge enough to maintain
            any other Hypotheſis, who was ſo ignorant in
            Mathematicks, as to deny, any good Author
            held this. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s899" xml:space="preserve">For I would fain know, whether
            there were never any that thought the Hea-
            vens to be ſolid Bodies, and that there
            were ſuch kinds of Motion, as is by thoſe
            feigned Orbs ſupplyed; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s900" xml:space="preserve">if ſo, Gæſar la Galla
            was much miſtaken. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s901" xml:space="preserve">I think his Aſſertions
            are equally true, that Galilæus and Keplar did
            not hold this, and that there were none which
            ever held that other. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s902" xml:space="preserve">Thus much for the
            Teſtimony of thoſe who were directly of this
            <s xml:id="echoid-s903" xml:space="preserve"/>