Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
71 59
72 60
73 61
74 42
75 63
76 65
77 65
78 66
79 67
80 68
81 69
82 70
83 71
84 72
85 73
86 74
87 75
88 76
89 77
90 78
91 79
92 80
93 81
94 82
95 83
96 84
97 85
98 86
99 87
100 88
< >
page |< < (65) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div98" type="section" level="1" n="35">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s998" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="65" file="0077" n="77" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            commonly ſee refuted in the Gommentators on
              <lb/>
            the Books de Gælo.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s999" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1000" xml:space="preserve">Vitellio and Reinoldus, Affirm the Spots to
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0077-01" xlink:href="note-0077-01a" xml:space="preserve">Opt. lib. 9.
                <lb/>
              comment.
                <lb/>
              in Pnrb.
                <lb/>
              pag. 164.</note>
            be the Thicker parts of the Moon, into which
              <lb/>
            the Sun cannot Infuſe much Light; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1001" xml:space="preserve">and this
              <lb/>
            (ſay they) is the Reaſon why in theSuns Eclip-
              <lb/>
            ſes, the Spots and Brighter parts, are ſtill in ſome
              <lb/>
            meaſure Diſtinguiſhed, becauſe the Sun Beams
              <lb/>
            are not able ſo well to Penetrate through thoſe
              <lb/>
            Thicker, as they may through the Thinner
              <lb/>
            parts of that Planet. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1002" xml:space="preserve">Of this Opinion alſo was
              <lb/>
            Gæſar la GaHa, whoſe Words are theſe, The
              <lb/>
            ‘ Moon doth there appear Cleareſt, where ſhe
              <lb/>
            ‘ is Tranſpicious, not only through the Superfi-
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0077-02" xlink:href="note-0077-02a" xml:space="preserve">Ex'qua par-
                <lb/>
              te luna eſt
                <lb/>
              tranſpicua
                <lb/>
              non ſolum
                <lb/>
              ſecundum
                <lb/>
              ſuperficiem
                <lb/>
              ſed etiam
                <lb/>
              ſecundum
                <lb/>
              ſubſtantiam
                <lb/>
              eatenus cla-
                <lb/>
              ra, ex qna
                <lb/>
              autem parte
                <lb/>
              opaca eſt
                <lb/>
              eatenus ob-
                <lb/>
              ſcura vide-
                <lb/>
              tur. De Phæ-
                <lb/>
              nom. eap. II.
                <lb/>
              Albert.
                <lb/>
              mag. de
                <lb/>
              Coævis
                <lb/>
              Q. 4. Art.
                <lb/>
              12.
                <lb/>
              Colleg. Con.</note>
            ‘ cies, but the Subſtance alſo, and there ſhe
              <lb/>
            ‘ ſeems ſpotted, where her Body is moſt Opa-
              <lb/>
            cous. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1003" xml:space="preserve">The ground of this his Aſſertion, was,
              <lb/>
            becauſe he thought the Moon did receive and
              <lb/>
            beſtow her Light by Illumination only, and not
              <lb/>
            at all by reſlexion; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1004" xml:space="preserve">but this, together with the
              <lb/>
            ſuppoſed Penetration of the Sun-Beams, and
              <lb/>
            the Perſpicuity of the Moons Body, I have
              <lb/>
            above Anſwered and Refuted.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1005" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1006" xml:space="preserve">The more Common and general Opinion, is,
              <lb/>
            that the Spots are the Thinner parts of the
              <lb/>
            Moon, which are leſs able to reflect the Beams
              <lb/>
            that they receive from the Sun, and this is moſt
              <lb/>
            agreeable to reaſon; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1007" xml:space="preserve">for if the Stars are there-
              <lb/>
            fore brighteſt, becauſe they are Thicker, and
              <lb/>
            more Solid than their Orbs, then it will follow,
              <lb/>
            that thoſe parts of the Moon which have leſs
              <lb/>
            Light, have alſo leſs Thickneſs. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1008" xml:space="preserve">It was the
              <lb/>
            Providence of Nature (ſay ſome) that ſo con-
              <lb/>
            trived that Planet to have theſe Spots within
              <lb/>
            it; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s1009" xml:space="preserve">for ſince that is neareſt to thoſe lower </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum