Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
81 69
82 70
83 71
84 72
85 73
86 74
87 75
88 76
89 77
90 78
91 79
92 80
93 81
94 82
95 83
96 84
97 85
98 86
99 87
100 88
101 89
102 90
103 91
104 92
105 93
106 94
107 95
108 96
109 97
110 98
< >
page |< < (29) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div51" type="section" level="1" n="30">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s463" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="29" file="0041" n="41" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            you may ſee ſundry Diſcourſes more at large
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-01" xlink:href="note-0041-01a" xml:space="preserve">In opere 6.
                <lb/>
              dierum.
                <lb/>
              diſput. 5.
                <lb/>
              In lib. de
                <lb/>
              Mundi
                <lb/>
              conſtit.</note>
            in Ludovicus Molina, Euſebius Nirembergius,
              <lb/>
            with divers others. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s464" xml:space="preserve">The Venerable Bede
              <lb/>
            thought the Planets to conſiſt of all the four
              <lb/>
            Elements; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s465" xml:space="preserve">and ’tis likely that the other parts
              <lb/>
            are of an Aerous Subſtance, as will be ſhewed
              <lb/>
            after wards; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s466" xml:space="preserve">however, I cannot now ſtand to re-
              <lb/>
            cite the Arguments for either; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s467" xml:space="preserve">I have only
              <lb/>
            urged theſe Authorities to countervail Ariſtotle,
              <lb/>
            and the School-Men, and the better to make
              <lb/>
            way for a proof of their Corruptibility.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s468" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s469" xml:space="preserve">The next thing then to be enquir'd after, is,
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-02" xlink:href="note-0041-02a" xml:space="preserve">2 Pet. 3. 12</note>
            whether they be of a corruptible Nature, not
              <lb/>
            whether they can be deſtroyed of God; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s470" xml:space="preserve">for
              <lb/>
            this, Scripture puts out of doubt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s471" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s472" xml:space="preserve">Nor whether or no in a long time they
              <lb/>
            would wear away and grow worſe; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s473" xml:space="preserve">for from
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-03" xlink:href="note-0041-03a" xml:space="preserve">By Doctor
                <lb/>
              Hakewell.
                <lb/>
              Ap. l. lib. 2.</note>
            any ſuch Fear they have been lately priviledg-
              <lb/>
            ed. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s474" xml:space="preserve">But whether they are capable of ſuch
              <lb/>
            changes and viciſſitudes, as this inferiour
              <lb/>
            World is lyable unto?</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s475" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s476" xml:space="preserve">The two chief Opinions concerning this,
              <lb/>
            have both erred in ſome extremity, the one
              <lb/>
            ſide going ſo far from the other, that they
              <lb/>
            have both gone beyond the Right, whilſt
              <lb/>
            Ariſtotle hath oppos'd the Truth, as well as the
              <lb/>
            Stoicks.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s477" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s478" xml:space="preserve">Some of the Ancients have thought, that
              <lb/>
            the Heavenly Bodies have ſtood in need of
              <lb/>
              <note symbol="*" position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-04" xlink:href="note-0041-04a" xml:space="preserve">Plutarch
                <lb/>
              de plac.
                <lb/>
              philoſ. l. 2.
                <lb/>
              c. 17.
                <lb/>
              Nat. Hiſt.
                <lb/>
              l. 2. c. 9.
                <lb/>
              Nat. quæſt.
                <lb/>
              lib. 2. c. 5.</note>
            Nouriſhment from the Elements, by which
              <lb/>
            they were continually Fed, and ſo had divers
              <lb/>
            Alterations by reaſon of their Food?</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s479" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s480" xml:space="preserve">Fathered on Heraclitus, followed by that great
              <lb/>
            Naturaliſt Pliny, and in general attributed to all the Stoicks. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s481" xml:space="preserve">You may ſee Seneca </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>