Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
271 91
272 92
273 93
274 94
275 95
276 96
277 97
278 98
279 99
280 100
281 101
282 102
283 103
284 104
285 105
286 106
287 107
288 108
289 109
290 110
291 111
292 112
293 113
294 114
295 115
296 116
297 117
298 118
299 119
300 120
< >
page |< < (97) of 370 > >|
That the Eartb may be a Planet.
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="97" file="0277" n="277" rhead="That the Eartb may be a Planet."/>
            ſtance from the Earth, and no nearer or far-
              <lb/>
            ther. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">And beſides, this Argument might as
              <lb/>
            well be urged againſt the Hypotheſis of Pto-
              <lb/>
            lomy or Tycbo, ſince the Stars, for ought
              <lb/>
            we know, might have been as ſerviceable to
              <lb/>
            us, if they had been placed far nearer than
              <lb/>
            either of thoſe Authors ſuppoſe them. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">A-
              <lb/>
            gain, were there any force in ſuch a Conſe-
              <lb/>
            quence, it would as well conclude a great
              <lb/>
            improvidence of Nature, in making ſuch a
              <lb/>
            multitude of thoſe leſſer Stars, which have
              <lb/>
            lately been diſcovered by the Perſpective.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">For to what purpoſe ſhould ſo many Lights
              <lb/>
            be created for the uſe of Man, ſince his Eyes
              <lb/>
            were not able to diſcern them? </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">So that our
              <lb/>
            diſability to comprehend all thoſe ends
              <lb/>
            which might be aimed at in the Works of
              <lb/>
            Nature, can be no ſufficient Argument to
              <lb/>
            prove their ſuperfluity. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Though Scripture
              <lb/>
            tells us, that theſe things were made for
              <lb/>
            our uſe, yet it does not tell us, that this is
              <lb/>
            their only end. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">’Tis not impoſſible, but that
              <lb/>
            there may be elſewhere ſome other Inhabi-
              <lb/>
            tants, by whom theſe leſſer Stars may be
              <lb/>
            more plainly diſcerned. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">And (as was ſaid
              <lb/>
            before) why may not we affirm that of the
              <lb/>
            bigneſs, which our Adverſaries do concern-
              <lb/>
            ing the motion of the Heavens? </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">That God,
              <lb/>
            to ſhew his own immenſity, did put a kind
              <lb/>
            of infinity in the Creature.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <div type="float" level="2" n="13">
            <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0276-01" xlink:href="note-0276-01a" xml:space="preserve">Eccl.8.17.</note>
          </div>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">There is yet another Argument to this
              <lb/>
            purpoſe, urged by
              <anchor type="note" xlink:href="" symbol="*"/>
            Al. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Roſſ. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">which was not
              <anchor type="note" xlink:label="note-0277-01a" xlink:href="note-0277-01"/>
            referred to any of the former kind, becauſe
              <lb/>
            I could ſcarcely believe I did rightly under-</s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>