Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
281 101
282 102
283 103
284 104
285 105
286 106
287 107
288 108
289 109
290 110
291 111
292 112
293 113
294 114
295 115
296 116
297 117
298 118
299 119
300 120
301 121
302 122
303 123
304 124
305 125
306 126
307 127
308 128
309 129
310 130
< >
page |< < (109) of 370 > >|
That the Earth may be a Planet.
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div type="section" level="1" n="63">
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="109" file="0289" n="289" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            thing, becauſe it was ſo in one thing: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">And
              <lb/>
            this would be an excellent Argument to prove
              <lb/>
            that Opinion of Anaxagoras, that the Snow
              <lb/>
            was black.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">The reaſon why that motion which is
              <lb/>
            cauſed by the Earth, does appear as if it
              <lb/>
            were in the Heavens, is, becauſe the ſenſus
              <lb/>
            communis, in judging of it, does conceive
              <lb/>
            the Eye to be it ſelf immovable, (as was
              <lb/>
            ſaid before) there being no ſenſe that does
              <lb/>
            diſcern the effects of any motion in the Bo-
              <lb/>
            dy; </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">and therefore, it does conclude every
              <lb/>
            thing to move, which it does perceive to
              <lb/>
            change its diſtance from it: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">So that the
              <lb/>
            Clouds do not ſeem to move ſometimes,
              <lb/>
            when as notwithſtanding they are every
              <lb/>
            where carried about with our Earth, by ſuch
              <lb/>
            a ſwift revolution; </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">yet this can be no hin-
              <lb/>
            drance at all, why we may not judg aright
              <lb/>
            of their other particular Motions, for which
              <lb/>
            there is not the ſame reaſon. </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">Though to a
              <lb/>
            Man in a Ship, the Trees and Banks may
              <lb/>
            ſeem to move; </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">yet it would be but a weak
              <lb/>
            Argument, to conclude from thence, that
              <lb/>
            therefore ſuch a one could not tell whether
              <lb/>
            his Friend does really ſtir, whom he ſees to
              <lb/>
            walk up and down in the Ship: </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">or that he
              <lb/>
            might as well be deceived in judging the
              <lb/>
            Oars to move, when they do not.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:space="preserve">’Tis again replied by the ſame Objector,
              <lb/>
            That it is not credible, the Eye ſhould be
              <lb/>
            miſtaken in judging of the Stars and Hea-
              <lb/>
            vens; </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">becauſe thoſe being light Bodies, are
              <lb/>
            the primary & </s>
            <s xml:space="preserve">proper Objects of that Senſe.</s>
            <s xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>