Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 221]
[Figure 222]
[Figure 223]
[Figure 224]
[Figure 225]
[Figure 226]
[Figure 227]
[Figure 228]
[Figure 229]
[Figure 230]
[Figure 231]
[Figure 232]
[Figure 233]
[Figure 234]
[Figure 235]
[Figure 236]
[Figure 237]
[Figure 238]
[Figure 239]
[Figure 240]
[Figure 241]
[Figure 242]
[Figure 243]
[Figure 244]
[Figure 245]
[Figure 246]
[Figure 247]
[Figure 248]
[Figure 249]
[Figure 250]
< >
page |< < of 701 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="040/01/311.jpg" pagenum="291"/>
              ed; therefore tell me how he diſ-ingageth himſelf in the next place
                <lb/>
              from that particular of the Stars having conſtantly kept the ſame
                <lb/>
              diſtance from the fixed Stars circumjacent to it.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>He betakes himſelf, in like manner, to two threads, yet
                <lb/>
              more unable to uphold him than the former: one of which is
                <lb/>
              wiſe faſtened to refraction, but ſo much leſs firmly, in that he
                <lb/>
              ſaith, that refraction operating upon the new Star, and ſublimating
                <lb/>
              it higher than its true ſituation, maketh the ſeeming diſtances
                <lb/>
              tain to be diſtinguiſhed from the true, when compared to the
                <lb/>
              cumpoſed fixed Stars that environ it. </s>
              <s>Nor can I ſufficiently
                <lb/>
              mire how he can diſſemble his knowing how that the ſame
                <lb/>
              ction will work alike upon the new Star, as upon the antient one
                <lb/>
              its neighbour, elevating both equally, ſo as that ſuch a like
                <lb/>
              dent altereth not the ſpace betwixt them. </s>
              <s>His other ſubterfuge is
                <lb/>
              yet more unhappy, and carryeth with it much of ridiculous, it
                <lb/>
              ing founded upon the errour that may ariſe in the inſtrumen
                <lb/>
              peration it ſelf; whilſt that the Obſervator not being able to
                <lb/>
              conſtitute the centre of the eyes pupil in the centre of the
                <lb/>
              tant (an Inſtrument imployed in obſerving the diſtance between
                <lb/>
              two Stars) but holding it elevated above that centre, as much as
                <lb/>
              the ſaid pupil is diſtant from I know not what bone of the cheek,
                <lb/>
              againſt which the end of the Inſtrument reſteth, there is formed
                <lb/>
              in the eye an angle more acute than that which is made by the ſides
                <lb/>
              of the Inſtrument; which angle of rayes differeth alſo from it
                <lb/>
              ſelf, at ſuch time as a man looketh upon Stars, not much elevated
                <lb/>
              above the Horizon, and the ſame being afterwards placed at a
                <lb/>
              great height; that angle, ſaith he, is made different, while the
                <lb/>
              ſtrument goeth aſcending, the head ſtanding ſtill: but if in
                <lb/>
              ting the Inſtrument, the neck ſhould bend backwards, and the
                <lb/>
              head go riſing, together with the Inſtrument, the angle would then
                <lb/>
              continue the ſame. </s>
              <s>So that the Authours anſwer ſuppoſeth that
                <lb/>
              the Obſervators in uſing the Inſtrument have not raiſed the head,
                <lb/>
              as they ought to have done; a thing which hath nothing of
                <lb/>
              hood in it. </s>
              <s>But granting that ſo it had been, I leave you to judge
                <lb/>
              what difference can be between two acute angles of two
                <lb/>
              ral triangles, the ſides of one of which triangles are each four
                <lb/>
              [
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Italian] Braces
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              [
                <emph type="italics"/>
              i.e.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              about three Engliſh yards] and thoſe of the
                <lb/>
              other, four braces within the quantity of the diameter of a Pea;
                <lb/>
              for the differences cannot be abſolutely greater between the length
                <lb/>
              of the two viſive rayes, whilſt the line is drawn perpendicularly
                <lb/>
              from the centre of the pupil, upon the plain of the Rule of the
                <lb/>
              Sextant (which line is no bigger than the breath of the thumb)
                <lb/>
              and the length of the ſame rayes, whilſt elevating the Sextant,
                <lb/>
              without raiſing the head together with it, that ſame line no longer
                <lb/>
              falleth perpendicularly upon the ſaid plane, but inclineth, making </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>