Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/158.jpg
"
pagenum
="
140
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>The top will run reeling along the floor towards that
<
lb
/>
part whither its upper parts encline it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>And why not whither the contrary parts tend, namely,
<
lb
/>
thoſe which touch the ground?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Becauſe thoſe upon the ground happen to be impeded
<
lb
/>
by the roughneſs of the touch, that is, by the floors unevenneſs;
<
lb
/>
but the ſuperiour, which are in the tenuous and flexible air, are
<
lb
/>
hindred very little, if at all; and therefore the top will obey their
<
lb
/>
inclination.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>So that that taction, if I may ſo ſay, of the neither
<
lb
/>
parts on the floor, is the cauſe that they ſtay, and onely the upper
<
lb
/>
parts ſpring the top forward.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>And therefore, if the top ſhould fall upon the ice, or
<
lb
/>
other very ſmooth ſuperficies, it would not ſo well run forward, but
<
lb
/>
might peradventure continue to revolve in it ſelf, (or ſleep)
<
lb
/>
out acquiring any progreſſive motion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>It is an eaſie thing for it ſo to do; but yet
<
lb
/>
leſs, it would not ſo ſpeedily come to ſleep, as when it falleth on
<
lb
/>
a ſuperficies ſomewhat rugged. </
s
>
<
s
>But tell me,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
when
<
lb
/>
the top turning round about it ſelf, in that manner, is let fall, why
<
lb
/>
doth it not move forwards in the air, as it doth afterwards when it
<
lb
/>
is upon the ground?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Becauſe having air above it, and beneath, neither thoſe
<
lb
/>
parts, nor theſe have any where to touch, and not having more
<
lb
/>
caſion to go forward than backward, it falls perpendicularly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>So then the onely reeling about its ſelf, without other
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
impetus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
can drive the top forward, being arrived at the ground,
<
lb
/>
very nimbly. </
s
>
<
s
>Now proceed we to what remains. </
s
>
<
s
>That laſh,
<
lb
/>
which the driver tyeth to his Top-ſtick, and with which, winding
<
lb
/>
it about the top, he ſets it (
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
i. </
s
>
<
s
>e.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
makes it go) what effect hath it on
<
lb
/>
the ſaid top?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>It conſtrains it to turn round upon its toe, that ſo it may
<
lb
/>
free it ſelf from the Top-laſh.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>So then, when the top arriveth at the ground, it cometh
<
lb
/>
all the way turning about its ſelf, by means of the laſh. </
s
>
<
s
>Hath it
<
lb
/>
not reaſon then to move in it ſelf more ſwiftly upon the ground,
<
lb
/>
than it did whilſt it was in the air?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Yes doubtleſs; for in the air it had no other impulſe
<
lb
/>
than that of the arm of the projicient; and if it had alſo the
<
lb
/>
ing, this (as hath been ſaid) in the air drives it not forward at all:
<
lb
/>
but arriving at the floor, to the motion of the arm is added the
<
lb
/>
progreſſion of the reeling, whereby the velocity is redoubled. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
I know already very well, that the top skipping from the ground,
<
lb
/>
its velocity will deminiſh, becauſe the help of its circulation is
<
lb
/>
wanting; and returning to the Earth will get it again, and by that </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>