Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/173.jpg
"
pagenum
="
155
"/>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg345
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Projects
<
lb
/>
nue their motion
<
lb
/>
by the right line
<
lb
/>
that followeth the
<
lb
/>
direction of the
<
lb
/>
motion, made
<
lb
/>
gether with the
<
lb
/>
projicient, whil'ſt
<
lb
/>
they were conjoin'd
<
lb
/>
therewith.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>So it is, in my opinion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Now imagine the cylinder to be erected, and that the
<
lb
/>
Earth doth revolve about with a diurnal motion, carrying the
<
lb
/>
piece along with it, tell me what ſhall be the motion of the ball
<
lb
/>
within the cylinder, having given fire?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>It ſhall be a ſtreight and perpendicular motion, the
<
lb
/>
der being erected perpendicularly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Conſider well what you ſay: for I believe that it will
<
lb
/>
not be perpendicular. </
s
>
<
s
>It would indeed be perpendicular, if the
<
lb
/>
Earth ſtood ſtill, for ſo the ball would have no other motion but
<
lb
/>
that proceeding from the fire. </
s
>
<
s
>But in caſe the Earth turns round,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg346
"/>
<
lb
/>
the ball that is in the piece, hath likewiſe a diurnal motion, ſo
<
lb
/>
that there being added to the ſame the impulſe of the fire, it
<
lb
/>
veth from the breech of the piece to the muzzle with two motions,
<
lb
/>
from the compoſition whereof it cometh to paſſe that the motion
<
lb
/>
made by the centre of the balls gravity is an inclining line. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
for your clearer underſtanding the ſame, let the piece A C [
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in
<
lb
/>
Fig.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
2.] be erected, and in it the ball B; it is manifeſt, that the
<
lb
/>
piece ſtanding immoveable, and fire being given to it, the ball
<
lb
/>
will make its way out by the mouth A, and with its centre,
<
lb
/>
ſing thorow the the piece, ſhall have deſcribed the perpendicular
<
lb
/>
line B A, and it ſhall purſue that rectitude when it is out of the
<
lb
/>
piece, moving toward the Zenith. </
s
>
<
s
>But in caſe the Earth ſhould
<
lb
/>
move round, and conſequently carry the piece along with it, in
<
lb
/>
the time that the ball driven out of the piece ſhall move along
<
lb
/>
the cylinder, the piece being carried by the Earth, ſhall paſſe
<
lb
/>
to the ſituation D E, and the ball B, in going off, would be at
<
lb
/>
the corniſh D, and the motion of the bals centre, would have
<
lb
/>
been according to the line B D, no longer perpendicular, but
<
lb
/>
clining towards the Eaſt; and the ball (as hath been concluded)
<
lb
/>
being to continue its motion through the air, according to the
<
lb
/>
direction of the motion made in the piece, the ſaid motion ſhall
<
lb
/>
continue on according to the inclination of the line B D, and ſo
<
lb
/>
ſhall no longer be perpendicular, but inclined towards the Eaſt,
<
lb
/>
to which part the piece doth alſo move; whereupon the ball may
<
lb
/>
follow the motion of the Eerth, and of the piece. </
s
>
<
s
>Now
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
you ſee it demonſtrated, that the Range which you took to be
<
lb
/>
perpendicular, is not ſo.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg346
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The revolution
<
lb
/>
of the Earth
<
lb
/>
poſed, the ball in
<
lb
/>
the piece erected
<
lb
/>
perpendicularly,
<
lb
/>
doth not move by a
<
lb
/>
perpendicular, but
<
lb
/>
an inclined line.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I do not very well underſtand this buſineſs; do you,
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Salviatus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I apprehend it in part; but I have a certain kind of
<
lb
/>
ſcruple, which I wiſh I knew how to expreſs. </
s
>
<
s
>It ſeems to me, that
<
lb
/>
according to what hath been ſaid, if the Piece be erected
<
lb
/>
dicular, and the Earth do move, the ball would not be to fall, as
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Tycho
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will have it, far from the Piece towards the </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>