Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/200.jpg
"
pagenum
="
182
"/>
amongſt thoſe who know nothing thereof. </
s
>
<
s
>Now to ſhew you how
<
lb
/>
great their errour is who ſay, that a Sphere
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
v.g.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of braſſe, doth not
<
lb
/>
touch a plain
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
v.g.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of ſteel in one ſole point, Tell me what
<
lb
/>
ceipt you would entertain of one that ſhould conſtantly aver, that
<
lb
/>
the Sphere is not truly a Sphere.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg368
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The truth
<
lb
/>
ſometimes gaines
<
lb
/>
ſtrength by
<
lb
/>
tradiction.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I would eſteem him wholly devoid of reaſon.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>He is in the ſame caſe who ſaith that the material Sphere
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg369
"/>
<
lb
/>
doth not touch a plain, alſo material, in one onely point; for to
<
lb
/>
ſay this is the ſame, as to affirm that the Sphere is not a Sphere.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>And that this is true, tell me in what it is that you conſtitute the
<
lb
/>
Sphere to conſiſt, that is, what it is that maketh the Sphere differ
<
lb
/>
from all other ſolid bodies.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg369
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The sphere
<
lb
/>
though material,
<
lb
/>
toucheth the
<
lb
/>
rial plane but in
<
lb
/>
one point onely.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I believe that the eſſence of a Sphere conſiſteth in
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg370
"/>
<
lb
/>
ving all the right lines produced from its centre to the
<
lb
/>
rence, equal.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg370
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The definition of
<
lb
/>
the ſphere.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>So that, if thoſe lines ſhould not be equal, there ſame
<
lb
/>
ſolidity would be no longer a ſphere?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. True.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Go to; tell me whether you believe that amongſt the
<
lb
/>
many lines that may be drawn between two points, that may be
<
lb
/>
more than one right line onely.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>There can be but one.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But yet you underſtand that this onely right line ſhall
<
lb
/>
again of neceſſity be the ſhorteſt of them all?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I know it, and alſo have a demonſtration thereof,
<
lb
/>
duced by a great
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Peripatetick
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Philoſopher, and as I take it, if my
<
lb
/>
memory do not deceive me, he alledgeth it by way of reprehending
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that ſuppoſeth it as known, when it may be
<
lb
/>
ſtrated.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>This muſt needs be a great Mathematician, that knew
<
lb
/>
how to demonſtrate that which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
neither did, nor could
<
lb
/>
demonſtrate. </
s
>
<
s
>And if you remember his demonſtration, I would
<
lb
/>
gladly hear it: for I remember very well, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in his
<
lb
/>
Books,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
de Sphærà & Cylindro,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
placeth this Propoſition amongſt the
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Poſtulata
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and I verily believe that he thought it demonſtrated.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I think I ſhall remember it, for it is very eaſie and
<
lb
/>
ſhort.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>The diſgrace of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and the honour of this
<
lb
/>
loſopher ſhall be ſo much the greater.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I will deſcribe the Figure of it. </
s
>
<
s
>Between the points
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg371
"/>
<
lb
/>
A and B, [
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in Fig.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
5.] draw the right line A B, and the curve line
<
lb
/>
A C B, of which we will prove the right to be the ſhorter: and
<
lb
/>
the proof is this; take a point in the curve-line, which let be C,
<
lb
/>
and draw two other lines, A C and C B, which two lines together;
<
lb
/>
are longer than the ſole line A B, for ſo demonſtrateth
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Euelid.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>