Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/203.jpg
"
pagenum
="
185
"/>
ſame in concrete, as they are imagined to be in abſtract?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>This I do affirm.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Then when ever in concrete you do apply a material Sphere </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg375
"/>
<
lb
/>
to a material plane, youapply an imperfect Sphere to an imperfect
<
lb
/>
plane, & theſe you ſay do not touch only in one point. </
s
>
<
s
>But I muſt
<
lb
/>
tell you, that even in abſtract an immaterial Sphere, that is, not a
<
lb
/>
perfect Sphere, may touch an immaterial plane, that is, not a
<
lb
/>
fect plane, not in one point, but with part of its ſuperficies, ſo that
<
lb
/>
hitherto that which falleth out in concrete, doth in like manner
<
lb
/>
hold true in abſtract. </
s
>
<
s
>And it would be a new thing that the
<
lb
/>
putations and rates made in abſtract numbers, ſhould not
<
lb
/>
wards anſwer to the Coines of Gold and Silver, and to the
<
lb
/>
chandizes in concrete. </
s
>
<
s
>But do you know
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
how this
<
lb
/>
commeth to paſſe? </
s
>
<
s
>Like as to make that the computations agree
<
lb
/>
with the Sugars, the Silks, the Wools, it is neceſſary that the
<
lb
/>
accomptant reckon his tares of cheſts, bags, and ſuch other things:
<
lb
/>
So when the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Geometricall Philoſopher
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
would obſerve in concrete
<
lb
/>
the effects demonſtrated in abſtract, he muſt defalke the
<
lb
/>
ments of the matter, and if he know how to do that, I do aſſure
<
lb
/>
you, the things ſhall jump no leſſe exactly, than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Arithmstical
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
computations. </
s
>
<
s
>The errours therefore lyeth neither in abſtract, nor
<
lb
/>
in concrete, nor in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Geometry,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
nor in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Phyſicks,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
but in the
<
lb
/>
tor, that knoweth not how to adjuſt his accompts. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore if
<
lb
/>
you had a perfect Sphere and plane, though they were material,
<
lb
/>
you need not doubt but that they would touch onely in one point.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>And if ſuch a Sphere was and is impoſſible to be procured, it was
<
lb
/>
much beſides the purpoſe to ſay,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Quod Sphæra ænea non tangit in
<
lb
/>
puncto.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Furthermore, if I grant you
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that in matter a
<
lb
/>
figure cannot be procured that is perfectly ſpherical, or perfectly
<
lb
/>
level: Do you think there may be had two materiall bodies,
<
lb
/>
whoſe ſuperficies in ſome part, and in ſome ſort are incurvated as
<
lb
/>
irregularly as can be deſired?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg375
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Things are
<
lb
/>
actly the ſame in
<
lb
/>
abſtract as in
<
lb
/>
crete.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>Of theſe I believe that there is no want.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>If ſuch there be, then they alſo will touch in one ſole
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg376
"/>
<
lb
/>
point; for this contact in but one point alone is not the ſole and
<
lb
/>
peculiar priviledge of the perfect Sphere and perfect plane. </
s
>
<
s
>Nay, he
<
lb
/>
that ſhould proſecute this point with more ſubtil contemplations
<
lb
/>
would finde that it is much harder to procure two bodies that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg377
"/>
<
lb
/>
touch with part of their ſnperſicies, than with one point onely.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>For if two ſuperficies be required to combine well together, it is
<
lb
/>
neceſſary either, that they be both exactly plane, or that if one be
<
lb
/>
convex, the other be concave; but in ſuch a manner concave,
<
lb
/>
that the concavity do exactly anſwer to the convexity of the other:
<
lb
/>
the which conditions are much harder to be found, in regard of
<
lb
/>
their too narrow determination, than thoſe others, which in their
<
lb
/>
caſuall latitude are infinite.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>