Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667
page |< < of 701 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="040/01/199.jpg" pagenum="181"/>
              ver ſo ſmall, yet is it alwayes more than ſufficient to reconduct the
                <lb/>
              moveable to the circumference, from which it is diſtant but its leaſt
                <lb/>
              ſpace, that is, nothing at all.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SAGR. </s>
              <s>Your diſcourſe, I muſt confeſs, is very accurate; and
                <lb/>
              yet no leſs concluding than it is ingenuous; and it muſt be
                <lb/>
              ted that to go about to handle natural queſtions, without
                <emph type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              try,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              is to attempt an impoſſibility.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>But
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Simplicius
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              will not ſay ſo; and yet I do not think
                <lb/>
              that he is one of thoſe
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Peripateticks
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              that diſſwade their Diſciples
                <lb/>
              from ſtudying the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Mathematicks,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              as Sciences that vitiate the
                <lb/>
              ſon, and render it leſſe apt for contemplation.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMP. </s>
              <s>I would not do ſo much wrong to
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Plato,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              but yet I may
                <lb/>
              truly ſay with
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Aristotle,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              that he too much loſt himſelf in, and too
                <lb/>
              much doted upon that his
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Geometry
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              : for that in concluſion theſe
                <lb/>
              Mathematical ſubtilties
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Salviatus
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              are true in abſtract, but applied
                <lb/>
              to ſenſible and Phyſical matter, they hold not good. </s>
              <s>For the
                <lb/>
              Mathematicians will very well demonſtrate for example, that
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Sphæratangit planum in puncto
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; a poſition like to that in diſpute,
                <lb/>
              but when one cometh to the matter, things ſucceed quite another
                <lb/>
              way. </s>
              <s>And ſo I may ſay of theſe angles of contact, and theſe
                <lb/>
              proportions; which all evaporate into Air, when they are applied
                <lb/>
              to things material and ſenſible.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>You do not think then, that the tangent toucheth the
                <lb/>
              ſuperficies of the terreſtrial Globe in one point only?</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMP. No, not in one ſole point; but I believe that a right
                <lb/>
              line goeth many tens and hundreds of yards touching the ſurface
                <lb/>
              not onely of the Earth, but of the water, before it ſeparate from
                <lb/>
              the ſame.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>But if I grant you this, do not you perceive that it
                <lb/>
              keth ſo much the more againſt your cauſe? </s>
              <s>For if it be ſuppoſed
                <lb/>
              that the tangent was ſeparated from the terreſtrial ſuperficies, yet
                <lb/>
              it hath been however demonſtrated that by reaſon of the great
                <lb/>
              cuity of the angle of contingence (if happily it may be call'd an
                <lb/>
              angle) the project would not ſeparate from the ſame; how much
                <lb/>
              leſſe cauſe of ſeparation would it have, if that angle ſhould be
                <lb/>
              wholly cloſed, and the ſuperficies and the tangent become all one?
                <lb/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg368"/>
                <lb/>
              Perceive you not that the Projection would do the ſame thing
                <lb/>
              on the ſurface of the Earth, which is aſmuch as to ſay, it would
                <lb/>
              do juſt nothing at all? </s>
              <s>You ſee then the power of truth, which
                <lb/>
              while you ſtrive to oppoſe it, your own aſſaults themſelves uphold
                <lb/>
              and defend it. </s>
              <s>But in regard that you have retracted this errour,
                <lb/>
              I would be loth to leave you in that other which you hold, namely,
                <lb/>
              that a material Sphere doth not touch a plain in one ſole point:
                <lb/>
              and I could wiſh ſome few hours converſation with ſome perſons
                <lb/>
              converſant in
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Geometry,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              might make you a little more intelligent </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum