Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/326.jpg
"
pagenum
="
306
"/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg559
"/>
<
lb
/>
we may aſſure our ſelves, I ſay, that bodies ſhining with moſt|
<
lb
/>
ly light do irradiate, or beam forth rayes more by far than thoſe
<
lb
/>
that are of a more languiſhing light. </
s
>
<
s
>I have many times ſeen
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
piter
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
together twenty or thirty degrees diſtant from the
<
lb
/>
Sun, and the air being very dark,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
appeared eight or ten
<
lb
/>
times bigger than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Jupiter,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
being both beheld by the eye at
<
lb
/>
ty; but being beheld afterwards with the Teleſcope, the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Jupiter
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
diſcovered it ſelf to be four or more times greater than
<
lb
/>
that of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
but the vivacity of the ſplendour of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
was
<
lb
/>
comparably bigger than the languiſhing light of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Jupiter
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; which
<
lb
/>
was only becauſe of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Jupiters
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
being far from the Sun, and from us;
<
lb
/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
neer to us, and to the Sun. </
s
>
<
s
>Theſe things premiſed, it
<
lb
/>
will not be difficult to comprehend, how Mars, when it is in
<
lb
/>
ſition to the Sun, and therefore neerer to the Earth by ſeven times,
<
lb
/>
and more, than it is towards the conjunction, cometh to appear
<
lb
/>
ſcarce four or five times bigger in that ſtate than in this, when as it
<
lb
/>
ſhould appear more than fifty times ſo much; of which the only
<
lb
/>
irradiation is the cauſe; for if we diveſt it of the adventitious
<
lb
/>
rayes, we ſhall find it exactly augmented with the due proportion:
<
lb
/>
but to take away the capillitious border, the Teleſcope is the beſt
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg560
"/>
<
lb
/>
and only means, which inlarging its
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
nine hundred or a
<
lb
/>
thouſand times, makes it to be ſeen naked and terminate, as that
<
lb
/>
of the Moon, and different from it ſelf in the two poſitions,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg561
"/>
<
lb
/>
cording to its due proportions to an hair. </
s
>
<
s
>Again, as to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
that in its veſpertine conjunction, when it is below the Sun, ought
<
lb
/>
to ſhew almoſt fourty times bigger than in the other matutine
<
lb
/>
junction, and yet doth not appear ſo much as doubled; it
<
lb
/>
eth, beſides the effect of the irradiation, that it is horned; and its
<
lb
/>
creſcents, beſides that they are ſharp, they do receive the Suns light
<
lb
/>
obliquely, and therefore emit but a faint ſplendour; ſo that as
<
lb
/>
being little and weak, its irradiation becometh the leſſe ample
<
lb
/>
and vivacious, than when it appeareth to us with its Hemiſphere all
<
lb
/>
ſhining: but now the Teleſcope manifeſtly ſhews its hornes to
<
lb
/>
have been as terminate and diſtinct as thoſe of the Moon, and
<
lb
/>
appear, as it were, with a great circle, and in a proportion thoſe
<
lb
/>
well neer fourty times greater than its ſame
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
at ſuch time
<
lb
/>
as it is ſuperiour to the Sun in its ultimate matutine apparition.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg556
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
An eaſie
<
lb
/>
riment that
<
lb
/>
eth the increaſe in
<
lb
/>
the ſtars, by means
<
lb
/>
of the adventitious
<
lb
/>
rays.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg557
"/>
Jupiter
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
augments
<
lb
/>
leſſe than the
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſtar.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg558
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Sun
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Moon
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
increaſe
<
lb
/>
tle.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg559
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
It is ſeen by
<
lb
/>
nifeſt experience,
<
lb
/>
that the more
<
lb
/>
ſplendid bodies do
<
lb
/>
much more
<
lb
/>
ate than the leſſe
<
lb
/>
lucid.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg560
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Teleſcope
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
is the beſt means to
<
lb
/>
take away the
<
lb
/>
radiations of the
<
lb
/>
Stars.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg561
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Another ſecond
<
lb
/>
reaſon of the ſmall
<
lb
/>
apparent increaſe
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. Oh,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Nicholas Copernicus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
how great would have been
<
lb
/>
thy joy to have ſeen this part of thy Syſteme, confirmed with ſo
<
lb
/>
manifeſt
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg562
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg562
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſwaded by reaſons
<
lb
/>
contrary to ſenſible
<
lb
/>
experiments.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Tis true. </
s
>
<
s
>But how much leſſe the fame of his ſublime
<
lb
/>
wit amongſt the intelligent? </
s
>
<
s
>when as it is ſeen, as I alſo ſaid before,
<
lb
/>
that he did conſtantly continue to affirm (being perſwaded thereto
<
lb
/>
by reaſon) that which ſenſible experiments ſeemed to contradict;
<
lb
/>
for I cannot ceaſe to wonder that he ſhould conſtantly perſiſt in
<
lb
/>
ſaying, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
revolveth about the Sun, and is more than ſix </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>