Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/145.jpg
"
pagenum
="
127
"/>
hard, as ſuppoſe of braſs; what think you it would do being let
<
lb
/>
go? </
s
>
<
s
>do not you believe (as for my part I do) that it would lie
<
lb
/>
ſtill?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>If that ſuperficies were inclining?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. Yes; for ſo I have already ſuppoſed.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I cannot conceive how it ſhould lie ſtill: nay, I am
<
lb
/>
confident that it would move towards the declivity with much
<
lb
/>
penſneſs.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Take good heed what you ſay,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
for I am
<
lb
/>
confident that it would lie ſtill in what ever place you ſhould lay
<
lb
/>
it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>So long as you make uſe of ſuch ſuppoſitions,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
viatus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
I ſhall ceaſe to wonder if you inferr moſt abſurd
<
lb
/>
cluſions.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Are you aſſured, then, that it would freely move
<
lb
/>
wards the declivity?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>Who doubts it?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>And this you verily believe, not becauſe I told you ſo,
<
lb
/>
(for I endeavoured to perſwade you to think the contrary) but of
<
lb
/>
your ſelf, and upon your natural judgment.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>Now I ſee what you would be at; you ſpoke not this
<
lb
/>
as really believing the ſame; but to try me, and to wreſt matter
<
lb
/>
out of my own mouth wherewith to condemn me.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>You are in the right. </
s
>
<
s
>And how long would that Ball
<
lb
/>
move, and with what velocity? </
s
>
<
s
>But take notice that I inſtanced
<
lb
/>
in a Ball exactly round, and a plain exquiſitely poliſhed, that all
<
lb
/>
external and accidental impediments might be taken away. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
ſo would I have you remove all obſtructions cauſed by the Airs
<
lb
/>
ſiſtance to diviſion, and all other caſual obſtacles, if any other
<
lb
/>
there can be.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I very well underſtand your meaning, and as to your
<
lb
/>
demand, I anſwer, that the Ball would continue to move
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in
<
lb
/>
finitum,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
if the inclination of the plain ſhould ſo long laſt, and
<
lb
/>
tinually with an accelerating motion; for ſuch is the nature of
<
lb
/>
ponderous moveables, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
vires acquirant eundo
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
: and the
<
lb
/>
er the declivity was, the greater the velocity would be.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But if one ſhould require that that Ball ſhould move
<
lb
/>
upwards on that ſame ſuperficies, do you believe that it would
<
lb
/>
ſo do?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>Not ſpontaneouſly; but being drawn, or violently
<
lb
/>
thrown, it may.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>And in caſe it were thruſt forward by the impreſſion of
<
lb
/>
ſome violent
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
impetus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
from without, what and how great would
<
lb
/>
its motion be?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>The motion would go continually decreaſing and </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>