Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[Item 1.]
[2.] Ex Libris James S. Dearden Rampside
[3.] A DISCOVERY OF A New , OR,
[4.] In Two Parts.
[5.] The Fifth Edition Corrected and Amended. LONDON,
[6.] The Epiſtle to the READER.
[7.] The Propoſitions that are proved in this Diſcourſe. PROPOSITION I.
[8.] PROP. II.
[9.] PROP. III.
[10.] PROP. IV.
[11.] PROP. V.
[12.] PROP. VI.
[13.] PROP. VII.
[14.] PROP. VIII.
[15.] PROP. IX.
[16.] PROP. X.
[17.] PROP. XI.
[18.] PROP. XII.
[19.] PROP. XIII.
[20.] PROP. XIV.
[21.] The Firſt Book. That the MOON May be a WORLD. The Firſt Propoſition, by way of Preface.
[22.] Sed vanus ſtolidis hæc omnia finxerit Error.
[23.] Solis lunæq; labores.
[24.] Cum fruſtra reſonant æra auxiliaria Lunæ.
[25.] Una laboranti poterit ſuccerrere Lunæ.
[26.] Gantus & è cælo poſſunt deducere Lunam.
[27.] Cantus & ſi curru lunam deducere tentant, Et facerent, ſi non æra repulſa ſonant.
[28.] PROP. II. That a Plurality of Worlds doth not contradict any Principle of Reaſon or Faith.
[29.] Æſtuas infelix auguſto limite mundi.
[30.] PROP. III. That the Heavens do not conſiſt of any ſuch pure Matter, which can priviledge them from the like Change and Corruption, as theſe Inferiour, Bodies are liable unto.
< >
page |< < (48) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div77" type="section" level="1" n="33">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s768" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="48" file="0060" n="60" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            Nor may we think that the Earth's Shadow
              <lb/>
            can Cloud the proper Light of the Moon from
              <lb/>
            Appearing, or take away any thing from her
              <lb/>
            Inherent Brightneſs; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s769" xml:space="preserve">for this were to think a
              <lb/>
            Shadow to be a Body, an Opinion altogether
              <lb/>
            misbecoming a Philoſopher, as Tycho grants
              <lb/>
            in the fore-cited place, Nec umbra terrœ corpo-
              <lb/>
            reum quid eſt, aut denſa aliqua ſubſtantia, ut Lu-
              <lb/>
            nœ lumen obtenebrare poſſit, atque id viſui noſtro
              <unsure/>
              <lb/>
            prœripere, ſed eſt quœdam privatio luminis ſola-
              <lb/>
            ris, ob interpoſitum opacum corpus terrœ. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s770" xml:space="preserve">Nor
              <lb/>
            is the Earth's ſhadow any Corporal thing,
              <lb/>
            or thick ſubſtance, that it can Cloud the
              <lb/>
            Moons Brightneſs, or take it away from our
              <lb/>
            Sight; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s771" xml:space="preserve">but it is a meer privation of the Suns
              <lb/>
            Light by reaſon of her Interpoſition of the
              <lb/>
            Earth's Opacous Body.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s772" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s773" xml:space="preserve">3 If ſhe had any Light of her own, then
              <lb/>
            that would in it ſelf be either ſuch a ruddy
              <lb/>
            Brightneſs as appears in the Eclipſes, or elſe
              <lb/>
            ſuch a Leaden Duskiſh Light as we ſee in the
              <lb/>
            Darker parts of her Body, when ſhe is a little
              <lb/>
            paſt the Conjunction. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s774" xml:space="preserve">(That it muſt be one
              <lb/>
            of theſe, may follow from the Oppoſite Ar-
              <lb/>
            guments) but it is neither of theſe; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s775" xml:space="preserve">therefore
              <lb/>
            ſhe hath none of her own.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s776" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s777" xml:space="preserve">1. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s778" xml:space="preserve">’Tis not ſuch a ruddy Light as appears in
              <lb/>
            Eclipſes; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s779" xml:space="preserve">for then why can we not ſee the
              <lb/>
            like redneſs, when we may diſcern the Ob-
              <lb/>
            ſcure parts of the Moon?</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s780" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s781" xml:space="preserve">You will ſay, perhaps, that then the near-
              <lb/>
            neſs of that greater Light takes away that Ap-
              <lb/>
            pearance.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s782" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s783" xml:space="preserve">I Reply, this cannot be; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s784" xml:space="preserve">for then why does
              <lb/>
            Mars ſhine with his wonted Redneſs, </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>