Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[Item 1.]
[2.] Ex Libris James S. Dearden Rampside
[3.] A DISCOVERY OF A New , OR,
[4.] In Two Parts.
[5.] The Fifth Edition Corrected and Amended. LONDON,
[6.] The Epiſtle to the READER.
[7.] The Propoſitions that are proved in this Diſcourſe. PROPOSITION I.
[8.] PROP. II.
[9.] PROP. III.
[10.] PROP. IV.
[11.] PROP. V.
[12.] PROP. VI.
[13.] PROP. VII.
[14.] PROP. VIII.
[15.] PROP. IX.
[16.] PROP. X.
[17.] PROP. XI.
[18.] PROP. XII.
[19.] PROP. XIII.
[20.] PROP. XIV.
[21.] The Firſt Book. That the MOON May be a WORLD. The Firſt Propoſition, by way of Preface.
[22.] Sed vanus ſtolidis hæc omnia finxerit Error.
[23.] Solis lunæq; labores.
[24.] Cum fruſtra reſonant æra auxiliaria Lunæ.
[25.] Una laboranti poterit ſuccerrere Lunæ.
[26.] Gantus & è cælo poſſunt deducere Lunam.
[27.] Cantus & ſi curru lunam deducere tentant, Et facerent, ſi non æra repulſa ſonant.
[28.] PROP. II. That a Plurality of Worlds doth not contradict any Principle of Reaſon or Faith.
[29.] Æſtuas infelix auguſto limite mundi.
[30.] PROP. III. That the Heavens do not conſiſt of any ſuch pure Matter, which can priviledge them from the like Change and Corruption, as theſe Inferiour, Bodies are liable unto.
< >
page |< < (81) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div274" type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3905" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="81" file="0261" n="261" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            for the Earth; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3906" xml:space="preserve">which by reaſon of its hea-
              <lb/>
            vineſs, is naturally unfit for motion.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3907" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3908" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer : </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3909" xml:space="preserve">This Argument likewiſe is
              <lb/>
            grounded upon theſe two ſalſe Foundations:
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3910" xml:space="preserve">As,</s>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3911" xml:space="preserve">1. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3912" xml:space="preserve">That the whole Frame oſ Nature does
              <lb/>
            move round, excepting only the Earth.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3913" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3914" xml:space="preserve">2. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3915" xml:space="preserve">That the whole Earth, conſidered as
              <lb/>
            whole, and in its proper place, is heavy, or
              <lb/>
            more unſit for a natural motion than any of
              <lb/>
            the other Planets.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3916" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3917" xml:space="preserve">Which are ſo far from being ſuch general
              <lb/>
            Grounds, from which Controverſies ſhould
              <lb/>
            be diſcuſſed, That they are the very thing
              <lb/>
            in queſtion betwixt us and our Adverſa-
              <lb/>
            ries.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3918" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3919" xml:space="preserve">Arg. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3920" xml:space="preserve">3. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3921" xml:space="preserve">From the nature of all heavy
              <lb/>
            Bodies, which are to fall towards the loweſt
              <lb/>
            place. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3922" xml:space="preserve">From whence they conclude, that our
              <lb/>
            Earth muſt be in the Centre.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3923" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3924" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3925" xml:space="preserve">This may prove it to be a Cen-
              <lb/>
            tre of Gravity, but not of Diſtance; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3926" xml:space="preserve">or
              <lb/>
            that it is in the midſt of the World. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3927" xml:space="preserve">Yea,
              <lb/>
            (but fays our Adverſaries) Ariſtotle for this
              <lb/>
            urges a Demonſtration, which muſt needs
              <lb/>
            be infallible. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3928" xml:space="preserve">Thus, the motion of light
              <lb/>
            Bodies, does apparently ténd upward to-
              <lb/>
            wards the Circumference of the World :
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3929" xml:space="preserve">but now the motion of heavy Bodies, is di-
              <lb/>
            rectly contrary to the aſcent of the other ; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3930" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            whereſore it will neceſſarily follow, that theſe
              <lb/>
            do all of them tend unto the Centre of the
              <lb/>
            World.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3931" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>