Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[Item 1.]
[2.] Ex Libris James S. Dearden Rampside
[3.] A DISCOVERY OF A New , OR,
[4.] In Two Parts.
[5.] The Fifth Edition Corrected and Amended. LONDON,
[6.] The Epiſtle to the READER.
[7.] The Propoſitions that are proved in this Diſcourſe. PROPOSITION I.
[8.] PROP. II.
[9.] PROP. III.
[10.] PROP. IV.
[11.] PROP. V.
[12.] PROP. VI.
[13.] PROP. VII.
[14.] PROP. VIII.
[15.] PROP. IX.
[16.] PROP. X.
[17.] PROP. XI.
[18.] PROP. XII.
[19.] PROP. XIII.
[20.] PROP. XIV.
[21.] The Firſt Book. That the MOON May be a WORLD. The Firſt Propoſition, by way of Preface.
[22.] Sed vanus ſtolidis hæc omnia finxerit Error.
[23.] Solis lunæq; labores.
[24.] Cum fruſtra reſonant æra auxiliaria Lunæ.
[25.] Una laboranti poterit ſuccerrere Lunæ.
[26.] Gantus & è cælo poſſunt deducere Lunam.
[27.] Cantus & ſi curru lunam deducere tentant, Et facerent, ſi non æra repulſa ſonant.
[28.] PROP. II. That a Plurality of Worlds doth not contradict any Principle of Reaſon or Faith.
[29.] Æſtuas infelix auguſto limite mundi.
[30.] PROP. III. That the Heavens do not conſiſt of any ſuch pure Matter, which can priviledge them from the like Change and Corruption, as theſe Inferiour, Bodies are liable unto.
< >
page |< < (25) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div38" type="section" level="1" n="29">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s409" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="25" file="0037" n="37" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            hath been ſaid, I may conclude, that the ſilence
              <lb/>
            of Scripture, concerning any other World, is
              <lb/>
            not ſufficient Argument to prove that there is
              <lb/>
            none. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s410" xml:space="preserve">Thus for the two firſt Arguments.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s411" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s412" xml:space="preserve">Unto the third, I may anſwer, That this
              <lb/>
            very Example is quoted by others, to ſhew
              <lb/>
            the Ignorance of thoſe Primitive Times, who
              <lb/>
            did ſometimes condemn what they did not
              <lb/>
            underſtand, and have often cenſur'd the Law-
              <lb/>
            ful and undoubted Parts of Mathematicks for
              <lb/>
            Heretical, becauſe they themſelves could not
              <lb/>
            perceive a reaſon of it. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s413" xml:space="preserve">And therefore their
              <lb/>
            Practice, in this particular, is no fufficient Te-
              <lb/>
            ſtimony againſt us.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s414" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s415" xml:space="preserve">But laſtly, I anſwer to all the above nam'd
              <lb/>
            Objections, That the Term (World) may be
              <lb/>
            taken in a double Senſe, more Generally, for
              <lb/>
            the whole Univerſe, as it implies in it the
              <lb/>
            Elementary and Æthereal Bodies, the Stars
              <lb/>
            and the Earth. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s416" xml:space="preserve">Secondly, more particularly,
              <lb/>
            for an inferiour World conſiſting of Elements.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s417" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s418" xml:space="preserve">Now the main Drift of all theſe Arguments
              <lb/>
            is to confute a Plurality of Worlds in the firſt
              <lb/>
            Senſe; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s419" xml:space="preserve">and if there were any ſuch, it might,
              <lb/>
            perhaps, ſeem ſtrange, that Moſes, or St. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s420" xml:space="preserve">John
              <lb/>
            ſhould either not know, or not mention its
              <lb/>
            Creation. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s421" xml:space="preserve">And Virgilius was condemned for
              <lb/>
            this Opinion, becauſe he held, quòd ſit alius
              <lb/>
            mundus ſub terra, aliuſque Sol & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s422" xml:space="preserve">Luna, (as Ba-
              <lb/>
            ronius) That within our Globe of Earth, there
              <lb/>
            was another World, another Sun and Moon,
              <lb/>
            and ſo he might ſeem to exclude this from the
              <lb/>
            Number of the other Creatures.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s423" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s424" xml:space="preserve">But now there is no ſuch danger in this Opi-
              <lb/>
            nion, which is here deliver'd, ſince this World
              <lb/>
            is ſaid to be in the Moon, whoſe Creation is
              <lb/>
            particularly expreſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s425" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>