Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[Item 1.]
[2.] Ex Libris James S. Dearden Rampside
[3.] A DISCOVERY OF A New , OR,
[4.] In Two Parts.
[5.] The Fifth Edition Corrected and Amended. LONDON,
[6.] The Epiſtle to the READER.
[7.] The Propoſitions that are proved in this Diſcourſe. PROPOSITION I.
[8.] PROP. II.
[9.] PROP. III.
[10.] PROP. IV.
[11.] PROP. V.
[12.] PROP. VI.
[13.] PROP. VII.
[14.] PROP. VIII.
[15.] PROP. IX.
[16.] PROP. X.
[17.] PROP. XI.
[18.] PROP. XII.
[19.] PROP. XIII.
[20.] PROP. XIV.
[21.] The Firſt Book. That the MOON May be a WORLD. The Firſt Propoſition, by way of Preface.
[22.] Sed vanus ſtolidis hæc omnia finxerit Error.
[23.] Solis lunæq; labores.
[24.] Cum fruſtra reſonant æra auxiliaria Lunæ.
[25.] Una laboranti poterit ſuccerrere Lunæ.
[26.] Gantus & è cælo poſſunt deducere Lunam.
[27.] Cantus & ſi curru lunam deducere tentant, Et facerent, ſi non æra repulſa ſonant.
[28.] PROP. II. That a Plurality of Worlds doth not contradict any Principle of Reaſon or Faith.
[29.] Æſtuas infelix auguſto limite mundi.
[30.] PROP. III. That the Heavens do not conſiſt of any ſuch pure Matter, which can priviledge them from the like Change and Corruption, as theſe Inferiour, Bodies are liable unto.
< >
page |< < (42) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div69" type="section" level="1" n="32">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s668" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="42" file="0054" n="54" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            the Body of the Moon can never Totally co-
              <lb/>
            ver the Sun. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s669" xml:space="preserve">However in this he is ſingular,
              <lb/>
            all other Aſtronomers (if I may believe Kep-
              <lb/>
            lar) being on the Contrary Opinion, by Rea-
              <lb/>
            ſon the Diameter of the Moon does for the
              <lb/>
            moſt part appear Bigger to us than the Di-
              <lb/>
            ameter of the Sun.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s670" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s671" xml:space="preserve">But here Fulius Gœſar once more puts in to
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0054-01" xlink:href="note-0054-01a" xml:space="preserve">De phœ-
                <lb/>
              nom. Lunœ
                <lb/>
              c. 11.</note>
            hinder our Paſſage. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s672" xml:space="preserve">The Moon (ſaith he) is
              <lb/>
            is not altogether Opacous, becauſe ’tis ſtill
              <lb/>
            of the ſame Nature with the Heavens, which
              <lb/>
            are incapable of total Opacity: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s673" xml:space="preserve">and his Reaſon
              <lb/>
            is, becauſe Perſpicuity is an inſeparable Acci-
              <lb/>
            dent of thoſe purer Bodies; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s674" xml:space="preserve">and this he thinks
              <lb/>
            muſt neceſſarily be granted; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s675" xml:space="preserve">for he ſtops there,
              <lb/>
            and Proves no further; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s676" xml:space="preserve">but to this he Defers
              <lb/>
            an Anſwer, till he hath made up his Argument.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s677" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s678" xml:space="preserve">We may frequently ſee, that her Body
              <lb/>
            does ſo Eclipſe the Sun, as our Earth does
              <lb/>
            the Moon. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s679" xml:space="preserve">And beſides, the Mountains that
              <lb/>
            are obſerv'd there, do caſt a Dark Shadow
              <lb/>
            behind them, as ſhall be ſhewed afterwards.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s680" xml:space="preserve">
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0054-02" xlink:href="note-0054-02a" xml:space="preserve">Prop. 9.</note>
            Since then the like Interpoſition of them both,
              <lb/>
            doth produce the like Effect, they muſt ne-
              <lb/>
            ceſſarily be of the like Natures, that is, alike
              <lb/>
            Opacous, which is the thing to be ſhewed; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s681" xml:space="preserve">and
              <lb/>
            this was the reaſon (as Interpreters gueſs) why
              <lb/>
            Ariſtotle Affirmed the Moon to be of the
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0054-03" xlink:href="note-0054-03a" xml:space="preserve">In lib. de
                <lb/>
              animalib.</note>
            Earths Nature, becauſe of their Agreement
              <lb/>
            in Opacity, whereas all the other Elements,
              <lb/>
            ſave that, are in ſome meaſure Perſpicuous.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s682" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s683" xml:space="preserve">But, the greateſt Difference which may
              <lb/>
            ſeem to make our Earth altogether unlike
              <lb/>
            the Moon, is, becauſe the one is a Bright
              <lb/>
            Body, and hath Light of its own, and </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>