Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[31.] Necnon Oceano paſci phæbumque polumq; Gredimus.
[32.] PROP. IV. That the Moon is a Solid, Compacted, Opacous Body.
[33.] PROP. V. That the Moon hath not any Light of her own.
[34.] PROP. VI. That there is a World in the Moon, bath been the direct Opinion of many Ancient, with ſome Modern Mathematicians, and may probably de deduc’d from the Tenents of others.
[35.] PROP. VII. That thoſe Spots and brighter parts, which by our ſight may be diſtinguiſhed in the Moon, do ſhew the difference betwixt the Sea and Land, in that other World.
[36.] PROP. VIII. The Spots repeſent the Sea, and the brighter parts the Land.
[37.] PROP. IX. That there are high Mountains, deep Vallies, and ſpacious Plains in the Body of the Moon.
[38.] PROP. X. That there is an Atmo-ſphæra, or an Orb of groſs, Vaporous Air, immediately encompaſſing the body of the Moon.
[39.] PROP. XI. That as their World is our Moon, ſo our World is their Moon.
[40.] Provehimur portu, terræque urbeſque recedunt.
[41.] PROP. XII.
[42.] PROP. XIII.
[43.] PROP. XIV.
[44.] FINIS.
[45.] A DISCOURSE Concerning a Rem Planet. Tending to prove That ’tis probable our EARTH is one of the PLANETS. The Second Book. By John Wilkins, late L. Biſhop of Cheſter.
[46.] LONDON: Printed by J. D. for John Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s Church-Yard. M.DC.LXXXIV.
[47.] To the Reader.
[48.] PROP. I.
[49.] PROP. II.
[50.] PROP. III.
[51.] PROP. IV.
[52.] PROP. V.
[53.] PROP. VI.
[54.] PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.
[55.] That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.
[56.] PROP. II.
[57.] PROP. III.
[58.] PROP. IV.
[59.] PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.
[60.] PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.
< >
page |< < (109) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div296" type="section" level="1" n="63">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4311" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="109" file="0289" n="289" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            thing, becauſe it was ſo in one thing: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4312" xml:space="preserve">And
              <lb/>
            this would be an excellent Argument to prove
              <lb/>
            that Opinion of Anaxagoras, that the Snow
              <lb/>
            was black.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4313" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4314" xml:space="preserve">The reaſon why that motion which is
              <lb/>
            cauſed by the Earth, does appear as if it
              <lb/>
            were in the Heavens, is, becauſe the ſenſus
              <lb/>
            communis, in judging of it, does conceive
              <lb/>
            the Eye to be it ſelf immovable, (as was
              <lb/>
            ſaid before) there being no ſenſe that does
              <lb/>
            diſcern the effects of any motion in the Bo-
              <lb/>
            dy; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4315" xml:space="preserve">and therefore, it does conclude every
              <lb/>
            thing to move, which it does perceive to
              <lb/>
            change its diſtance from it: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4316" xml:space="preserve">So that the
              <lb/>
            Clouds do not ſeem to move ſometimes,
              <lb/>
            when as notwithſtanding they are every
              <lb/>
            where carried about with our Earth, by ſuch
              <lb/>
            a ſwift revolution; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4317" xml:space="preserve">yet this can be no hin-
              <lb/>
            drance at all, why we may not judg aright
              <lb/>
            of their other particular Motions, for which
              <lb/>
            there is not the ſame reaſon. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4318" xml:space="preserve">Though to a
              <lb/>
            Man in a Ship, the Trees and Banks may
              <lb/>
            ſeem to move; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4319" xml:space="preserve">yet it would be but a weak
              <lb/>
            Argument, to conclude from thence, that
              <lb/>
            therefore ſuch a one could not tell whether
              <lb/>
            his Friend does really ſtir, whom he ſees to
              <lb/>
            walk up and down in the Ship: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4320" xml:space="preserve">or that he
              <lb/>
            might as well be deceived in judging the
              <lb/>
            Oars to move, when they do not.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4321" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4322" xml:space="preserve">’Tis again replied by the ſame Objector,
              <lb/>
            That it is not credible, the Eye ſhould be
              <lb/>
            miſtaken in judging of the Stars and Hea-
              <lb/>
            vens; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4323" xml:space="preserve">becauſe thoſe being light Bodies, are
              <lb/>
            the primary & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4324" xml:space="preserve">proper Objects of that Senſe.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4325" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>