Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[31.] Necnon Oceano paſci phæbumque polumq; Gredimus.
[32.] PROP. IV. That the Moon is a Solid, Compacted, Opacous Body.
[33.] PROP. V. That the Moon hath not any Light of her own.
[34.] PROP. VI. That there is a World in the Moon, bath been the direct Opinion of many Ancient, with ſome Modern Mathematicians, and may probably de deduc’d from the Tenents of others.
[35.] PROP. VII. That thoſe Spots and brighter parts, which by our ſight may be diſtinguiſhed in the Moon, do ſhew the difference betwixt the Sea and Land, in that other World.
[36.] PROP. VIII. The Spots repeſent the Sea, and the brighter parts the Land.
[37.] PROP. IX. That there are high Mountains, deep Vallies, and ſpacious Plains in the Body of the Moon.
[38.] PROP. X. That there is an Atmo-ſphæra, or an Orb of groſs, Vaporous Air, immediately encompaſſing the body of the Moon.
[39.] PROP. XI. That as their World is our Moon, ſo our World is their Moon.
[40.] Provehimur portu, terræque urbeſque recedunt.
[41.] PROP. XII.
[42.] PROP. XIII.
[43.] PROP. XIV.
[44.] FINIS.
[45.] A DISCOURSE Concerning a Rem Planet. Tending to prove That ’tis probable our EARTH is one of the PLANETS. The Second Book. By John Wilkins, late L. Biſhop of Cheſter.
[46.] LONDON: Printed by J. D. for John Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s Church-Yard. M.DC.LXXXIV.
[47.] To the Reader.
[48.] PROP. I.
[49.] PROP. II.
[50.] PROP. III.
[51.] PROP. IV.
[52.] PROP. V.
[53.] PROP. VI.
[54.] PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.
[55.] That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.
[56.] PROP. II.
[57.] PROP. III.
[58.] PROP. IV.
[59.] PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.
[60.] PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.
< >
page |< < (97) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div274" type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4134" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="97" file="0277" n="277" rhead="That the Eartb may be a Planet."/>
            ſtance from the Earth, and no nearer or far-
              <lb/>
            ther. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4135" xml:space="preserve">And beſides, this Argument might as
              <lb/>
            well be urged againſt the Hypotheſis of Pto-
              <lb/>
            lomy or Tycbo, ſince the Stars, for ought
              <lb/>
            we know, might have been as ſerviceable to
              <lb/>
            us, if they had been placed far nearer than
              <lb/>
            either of thoſe Authors ſuppoſe them. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4136" xml:space="preserve">A-
              <lb/>
            gain, were there any force in ſuch a Conſe-
              <lb/>
            quence, it would as well conclude a great
              <lb/>
            improvidence of Nature, in making ſuch a
              <lb/>
            multitude of thoſe leſſer Stars, which have
              <lb/>
            lately been diſcovered by the Perſpective.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4137" xml:space="preserve">For to what purpoſe ſhould ſo many Lights
              <lb/>
            be created for the uſe of Man, ſince his Eyes
              <lb/>
            were not able to diſcern them? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4138" xml:space="preserve">So that our
              <lb/>
            diſability to comprehend all thoſe ends
              <lb/>
            which might be aimed at in the Works of
              <lb/>
            Nature, can be no ſufficient Argument to
              <lb/>
            prove their ſuperfluity. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4139" xml:space="preserve">Though Scripture
              <lb/>
            tells us, that theſe things were made for
              <lb/>
            our uſe, yet it does not tell us, that this is
              <lb/>
            their only end. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4140" xml:space="preserve">’Tis not impoſſible, but that
              <lb/>
            there may be elſewhere ſome other Inhabi-
              <lb/>
            tants, by whom theſe leſſer Stars may be
              <lb/>
            more plainly diſcerned. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4141" xml:space="preserve">And (as was ſaid
              <lb/>
            before) why may not we affirm that of the
              <lb/>
            bigneſs, which our Adverſaries do concern-
              <lb/>
            ing the motion of the Heavens? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4142" xml:space="preserve">That God,
              <lb/>
            to ſhew his own immenſity, did put a kind
              <lb/>
            of infinity in the Creature.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4143" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4144" xml:space="preserve">There is yet another Argument to this
              <lb/>
            purpoſe, urged by Al. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4145" xml:space="preserve">Roſſ. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4146" xml:space="preserve">which was
              <note symbol="*" position="right" xlink:label="note-0277-01" xlink:href="note-0277-01a" xml:space="preserve">Lib. I.
                <lb/>
              ſect. 2.6.I.</note>
            referred to any of the former kind, becauſe
              <lb/>
            I could ſcarcely believe I did rightly </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>