Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[41. PROP. XII.]
[42. PROP. XIII.]
[43. PROP. XIV.]
[44. FINIS.]
[45. A DISCOURSE Concerning a Rem Planet. Tending to prove That ’tis probable our EARTH is one of the PLANETS. The Second Book. By John Wilkins, late L. Biſhop of Cheſter.]
[46. LONDON: Printed by J. D. for John Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s Church-Yard. M.DC.LXXXIV.]
[47. To the Reader.]
[48. PROP. I.]
[49. PROP. II.]
[50. PROP. III.]
[51. PROP. IV.]
[52. PROP. V.]
[53. PROP. VI.]
[54. PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.]
[55. That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.]
[56. PROP. II.]
[57. PROP. III.]
[58. PROP. IV.]
[59. PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.]
[60. PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.]
[61. PROP. VII. Tis probable that the Sun is in the Gentre of the World.]
[62. PROP. VIII. That there is not any ſufficient reaſon to prove the Earth incapable of thoſe mo-tions which Copernicus aſcribes un-to it.]
[63. Provebimur portu, terræque, verbeſq; recedunt.]
[64. PROP. IX. That it is more probable the Earth does move, than the Sun or Heavens.]
[65. PROP. X. That this Hypotheſis is exactly agreeable to common appearances.]
[66. Quicunq; ſolam mente præcipiti petit]
[67. Brevem replere non valentis ambitum, # Pudebit aucti nominis.]
[68. FINIS.]
< >
page |< < (2) of 370 > >|
That the earth may be a Planet
and Opinion of others, and then afterwards
to deſcend unto the Reaſons that may be
drawn from the Nature and Eſſence of the
things themſelves:
Becauſe theſe inartificial
Arguments (as the Logicians call them) do
not carry with them any clear and convin-
cing evidence;
and therefore ſhould come
after thoſe that are of more neceſſary depen-
dance, as ſerving rather to confirm, than re-
ſolve the Judgment.
But yet, ſo it is, that in thoſe points which
are beſides the common Opinion, Men are
carried away at the firſt by the general cry,
and ſeldom or never come ſo far as to ex-
amine the reaſons that may be urged for
them.
And therefore, ſince it is the purpoſe
of this diſcourſe to remove thoſe prejudices
which may hinder our Judgment in the like
caſe, ’tis requiſit that in the firſt place there
be ſome ſatisfaction given to thoſe Argu-
ments that may be taken from the Authori-
ty of others.
Which Arguments are inſiſted on by our
adverſaries with much heat and violence.
What (ſay they) ſhall an upſtart Novel-
ty thruſt out ſuch a Truth as hath paſſed by
ſucceſſive Tradition through all Ages of the
World?
And hath been generally entertain-
ed, not only in the Opinion of the vulgar,
Alex.
Roſſ. de
Terræ
motu, co@-
træ Lan@b.
lib. 1. ſect.
1. cap. 10
but alſo of the greateſt Philoſophers and
moſt Learned Men?
Shall we think thatamongſt the multitude of thoſe who in ſeve-
ral times have been eminent for new inven-
tions and ſtrange diſcoveries, there was none

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index