Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[41. PROP. XII.]
[42. PROP. XIII.]
[43. PROP. XIV.]
[44. FINIS.]
[45. A DISCOURSE Concerning a Rem Planet. Tending to prove That ’tis probable our EARTH is one of the PLANETS. The Second Book. By John Wilkins, late L. Biſhop of Cheſter.]
[46. LONDON: Printed by J. D. for John Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s Church-Yard. M.DC.LXXXIV.]
[47. To the Reader.]
[48. PROP. I.]
[49. PROP. II.]
[50. PROP. III.]
[51. PROP. IV.]
[52. PROP. V.]
[53. PROP. VI.]
[54. PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.]
[55. That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.]
[56. PROP. II.]
[57. PROP. III.]
[58. PROP. IV.]
[59. PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.]
[60. PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.]
[61. PROP. VII. Tis probable that the Sun is in the Gentre of the World.]
[62. PROP. VIII. That there is not any ſufficient reaſon to prove the Earth incapable of thoſe mo-tions which Copernicus aſcribes un-to it.]
[63. Provebimur portu, terræque, verbeſq; recedunt.]
[64. PROP. IX. That it is more probable the Earth does move, than the Sun or Heavens.]
[65. PROP. X. That this Hypotheſis is exactly agreeable to common appearances.]
[66. Quicunq; ſolam mente præcipiti petit]
[67. Brevem replere non valentis ambitum, # Pudebit aucti nominis.]
[68. FINIS.]
< >
page |< < (98) of 370 > >|
That the Eartb may be a Planet.
ſtand it: ſince he puts it in the front of his
other Arguments, as being of ſtrength and
ſubtilty enough to be a Leader unto all the
reſt;
and yet in the moſt likely ſenſe of it,
’tis ſo extreamly ſimple to be preſſed in a
Controverſy, that every freſh Man would
laugh at it.
The words of it are theſe:
Quod minimum eſt in circulo debet eſſe centrum
illius, at Terr a longè minor eſt Sole, &
Æqui-
noctialis Terreſtris eſt omnium in Cælo circulus
minimus, ergo, &
c.
By the ſame reaſon, it would rather fol-
low, that the Moon, or Mercury, were in the
Centre, ſince both theſe are leſs than the
Earth.
And then, whereas he ſays, that the
Equinoctial of the Earth, is the leaſt Circle
in the Heavens, ’tis neigher true nor perti-
nent, and would make one ſuſpect, that he
who ſhould urge ſuch an Argument, did
ſcarce underſtand any thing in Aſtronomy.
There are many other Objections like un-
to this, not worth the citing:
The chief of
all have been already anſwered;
by which
you may diſcern, that there is not any ſuch
great neceſſity, as our Adverſaries pretend,
why the Earth ſhould be ſcituated in the
midſt of the Univerſe.

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index