Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[41.] PROP. XII.
[42.] PROP. XIII.
[43.] PROP. XIV.
[44.] FINIS.
[45.] A DISCOURSE Concerning a Rem Planet. Tending to prove That ’tis probable our EARTH is one of the PLANETS. The Second Book. By John Wilkins, late L. Biſhop of Cheſter.
[46.] LONDON: Printed by J. D. for John Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s Church-Yard. M.DC.LXXXIV.
[47.] To the Reader.
[48.] PROP. I.
[49.] PROP. II.
[50.] PROP. III.
[51.] PROP. IV.
[52.] PROP. V.
[53.] PROP. VI.
[54.] PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.
[55.] That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.
[56.] PROP. II.
[57.] PROP. III.
[58.] PROP. IV.
[59.] PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.
[60.] PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.
[61.] PROP. VII. Tis probable that the Sun is in the Gentre of the World.
[62.] PROP. VIII. That there is not any ſufficient reaſon to prove the Earth incapable of thoſe mo-tions which Copernicus aſcribes un-to it.
[63.] Provebimur portu, terræque, verbeſq; recedunt.
[64.] PROP. IX. That it is more probable the Earth does move, than the Sun or Heavens.
[65.] PROP. X. That this Hypotheſis is exactly agreeable to common appearances.
[66.] Quicunq; ſolam mente præcipiti petit
[67.] Brevem replere non valentis ambitum, # Pudebit aucti nominis.
[68.] FINIS.
< >
page |< < (23) of 370 > >|
3523That the Moon may be a World. People, as well as others, he does it after a
vulgar way, as it is commonly noted, decla-
ring the Original chiefly of thoſe things which
are obvious to the Senſe, and being ſilent of
other things, which then could not well be
apprehended.
And therefore Pererius propo-
11Com. in
1 Gen. 11.
ſing the queſtion, why the Creation of Plants
and Herbs is mentioned, but not of Mettals
and Minerals?
Anſwers. Quia iſtarum rerum generatio eſt
vulgo occulta &
ignota. Becauſe theſe things
are not ſo commonly known as the other;
and he adds, Moſes non omnia, ſed manifeſta
omnibus enarranda ſuſcipit.
Moſes did not in-
tend to relate unto us the beginnings of all
all things, but thoſe only which are moſt evi-
dent unto all Men.
And therefore too, Aqui-
22Part. 1. 2.
68. Art, 3.
nas obſerves, that he writes nothing of the
Air, becauſe that being inviſible, the People
knew not whether there were any ſuch Body
or no.
And for this very reaſon St. Ferom alſo
33Epiſt. 139-
ad Cypri.
So Pererives
in 2 Gen.
thinks, that there is nothing expreſt concerning
the Creation of Angels, becauſe the rude and
ignorant Vulgar were not ſo capable of appre-
hending their Natures.
And yet notwith-
ſtanding, theſe are as remarkable parts of the
Creation, and as fit to be known as another
World.
And therefore the Holy Ghoſt too,
uſes ſuch vulgar Expreſſions, which ſet things
forth rather as they appear, than as they are,
as when he calls the Moon one of the greater
44Gen. 1, 16 Lights, whereas ’tis the leaſt that we can ſee
in the whole Heavens.
So afterwards ſpeaking
55Gen. 11.
Mala. 3. 10.
of the great Rain which drowned the World,
he ſays, The Windows of Heaven

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index