Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[41.] PROP. XII.
[42.] PROP. XIII.
[43.] PROP. XIV.
[44.] FINIS.
[45.] A DISCOURSE Concerning a Rem Planet. Tending to prove That ’tis probable our EARTH is one of the PLANETS. The Second Book. By John Wilkins, late L. Biſhop of Cheſter.
[46.] LONDON: Printed by J. D. for John Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s Church-Yard. M.DC.LXXXIV.
[47.] To the Reader.
[48.] PROP. I.
[49.] PROP. II.
[50.] PROP. III.
[51.] PROP. IV.
[52.] PROP. V.
[53.] PROP. VI.
[54.] PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.
[55.] That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.
[56.] PROP. II.
[57.] PROP. III.
[58.] PROP. IV.
[59.] PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.
[60.] PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.
[61.] PROP. VII. Tis probable that the Sun is in the Gentre of the World.
[62.] PROP. VIII. That there is not any ſufficient reaſon to prove the Earth incapable of thoſe mo-tions which Copernicus aſcribes un-to it.
[63.] Provebimur portu, terræque, verbeſq; recedunt.
[64.] PROP. IX. That it is more probable the Earth does move, than the Sun or Heavens.
[65.] PROP. X. That this Hypotheſis is exactly agreeable to common appearances.
[66.] Quicunq; ſolam mente præcipiti petit
[67.] Brevem replere non valentis ambitum, # Pudebit aucti nominis.
[68.] FINIS.
< >
page |< < (82) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div274" type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <pb o="82" file="0262" n="262" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3932" xml:space="preserve">I anſwer: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3933" xml:space="preserve">Though Ariſtotle were a Maſter
              <lb/>
            in the Art of Syllogiſms, and he from whom
              <lb/>
            he received the Rules of Diſputation; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3934" xml:space="preserve">yet
              <lb/>
            in this particular, ’tis very plain that he
              <lb/>
            was deceived with a Fallacy, whilſt his Ar-
              <lb/>
            gument does but only ſuppoſe that which it
              <lb/>
            pretend to prove.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3935" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3936" xml:space="preserve">That light Bodies do aſcend unto ſome
              <lb/>
            Circumſerence which is higher and above
              <lb/>
            the Earth, is plain and undeniable. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3937" xml:space="preserve">But
              <lb/>
            that this Circumference is the ſame with that
              <lb/>
            of the World, or concentrical unto it, can-
              <lb/>
            not be reaſonably aſſirmed, unleſs he ſup-
              <lb/>
            poſes the Earth to be in the Centre of the
              <lb/>
            Univerſe, which is the thing to be pro-
              <lb/>
            ved.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3938" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3939" xml:space="preserve">I would fain know from what grounds
              <lb/>
            our Adverſaries can prove, that the deſcent
              <lb/>
            of heavy Bodies is to the Centre; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3940" xml:space="preserve">or the
              <lb/>
            aſcent of light Bodies, to the Circumference
              <lb/>
            of the World. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3941" xml:space="preserve">The utmoſt experience we
              <lb/>
            can have in this kind, does but extend to
              <lb/>
            thoſe things that are upon our Earth, or in
              <lb/>
            the Air above it. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3942" xml:space="preserve">And alas, what is this
              <lb/>
            unto the vaſt frame of the whole Univerſe,
              <lb/>
            but punctulum, ſuch an inſenſible Point,
              <lb/>
            which does not bear ſo great a proportion
              <lb/>
            to the whole, as a ſmall Sand does unto the
              <lb/>
            Earth? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3943" xml:space="preserve">Wherefore it were a ſenſleſs thing,
              <lb/>
            from our experience of ſo little a part, to
              <lb/>
            pronounce any thing inſallibly concerning
              <lb/>
            the ſcituation of the whole.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3944" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>