Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[51.] PROP. IV.
[52.] PROP. V.
[53.] PROP. VI.
[54.] PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.
[55.] That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.
[56.] PROP. II.
[57.] PROP. III.
[58.] PROP. IV.
[59.] PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.
[60.] PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.
[61.] PROP. VII. Tis probable that the Sun is in the Gentre of the World.
[62.] PROP. VIII. That there is not any ſufficient reaſon to prove the Earth incapable of thoſe mo-tions which Copernicus aſcribes un-to it.
[63.] Provebimur portu, terræque, verbeſq; recedunt.
[64.] PROP. IX. That it is more probable the Earth does move, than the Sun or Heavens.
[65.] PROP. X. That this Hypotheſis is exactly agreeable to common appearances.
[66.] Quicunq; ſolam mente præcipiti petit
[67.] Brevem replere non valentis ambitum, # Pudebit aucti nominis.
[68.] FINIS.
< >
page |< < (14) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div195" type="section" level="1" n="55">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2683" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="14" file="0194" n="194" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            nicus’s obſervations, and did intend to write
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0194-01" xlink:href="note-0194-01a" xml:space="preserve">Ibid.</note>
            a Commentary upon his other Works, but
              <lb/>
            that he was taken out of this Life before he
              <lb/>
            could finiſh thoſe reſolutions. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2684" xml:space="preserve">Unto theſe
              <lb/>
            alſo I might add the names of Gilbert, Keplar,
              <lb/>
            Gallilæus, with ſundry others, who have much
              <lb/>
            beautified and confirmed this Hypotheſis, with
              <lb/>
            their new inventions. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2685" xml:space="preserve">Nay, I may ſafely af-
              <lb/>
            firm, that amongſt the variety of thoſe Opi-
              <lb/>
            nions that are in Aſtronomy, there are more (of
              <lb/>
            thoſe which have skill in it) that are of this
              <lb/>
            Opinion, not only than any other, but
              <lb/>
            than all the reſt put together. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2686" xml:space="preserve">So that now
              <lb/>
            it is a greater Argument of Singularity to
              <lb/>
            oppoſe it.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2687" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2688" xml:space="preserve">’Tis probable, that many other of the
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0194-02" xlink:href="note-0194-02a" xml:space="preserve">5 Conſid.</note>
            Antients would have aſſented unto this Opi-
              <lb/>
            nion, if they had been acquainted with thoſe
              <lb/>
            experiments which later times have found
              <lb/>
            out for the confirmation of it: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2689" xml:space="preserve">And there-
              <lb/>
            fore Rheticus and Keplar do ſo often
              <note symbol="*" position="left" xlink:label="note-0194-03" xlink:href="note-0194-03a" xml:space="preserve">In Nar-
                <lb/>
              ratione.</note>
            that Ariſtotle were now alive again. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2690" xml:space="preserve">Queſti-
              <lb/>
            onleſs he was ſo rational and ingenious a
              <lb/>
              <note symbol="" position="left" xlink:label="note-0194-04" xlink:href="note-0194-04a" xml:space="preserve">Myſt.
                <lb/>
              Coſmogr.
                <lb/>
              cap. 1. Item
                <lb/>
              pref. ad 4.
                <lb/>
              1. Aſtr. Co-
                <lb/>
              pern.</note>
            Man (not half ſo obſtinate as many of his
              <lb/>
            followers) that upon ſuch probabilities as
              <lb/>
            theſe, he would quickly have renounced his
              <lb/>
            ownPrinciples, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2691" xml:space="preserve">have come over to this ſide:
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2692" xml:space="preserve">For in one place, having propoſed ſome
              <lb/>
            queſtions about the Heavens, which were
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0194-05" xlink:href="note-0194-05a" xml:space="preserve">de Cal. l. 2.
                <lb/>
              c. 12.</note>
            not eaſie to be reſolved: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2693" xml:space="preserve">He ſets down this
              <lb/>
            rule, that in difficulties, a Man may take a
              <lb/>
            liberty to ſpeak that which ſeems moſt like-
              <lb/>
            ly to him: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2694" xml:space="preserve">And in ſuch caſes, an aptneſs to
              <lb/>
            gueſs at ſome reſolution, for the </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>