Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Table of contents

< >
[51.] PROP. IV.
Page: 179
[52.] PROP. V.
Page: 179
[53.] PROP. VI.
Page: 180
[54.] PROP. VII. PROP. VIII. PROP. IX. PROP. X.
Page: 180
[55.] That the EARTH May be a PLANET. PROP. I.
Page: 181 ((1))
[56.] PROP. II.
Page: 201 (21)
[57.] PROP. III.
Page: 215 (35)
[58.] PROP. IV.
Page: 236 (56)
[59.] PROP. V. That the Scripture, in its proper conſtru-ction, does not any where affirm the Immobility of the Earth.
Page: 246 (66)
[60.] PROP. VI. That there is not any Argument from the Words of Scripture, Principles of Na-ture, or Obſervations in Aſtronomy, which can ſuſſiciently evidence the Earth to be in the Gentre of the Uni-verſe.
Page: 258 (78)
[61.] PROP. VII. Tis probable that the Sun is in the Gentre of the World.
Page: 279 (99)
[62.] PROP. VIII. That there is not any ſufficient reaſon to prove the Earth incapable of thoſe mo-tions which Copernicus aſcribes un-to it.
Page: 286 (106)
[63.] Provebimur portu, terræque, verbeſq; recedunt.
Page: 288 (108)
[64.] PROP. IX. That it is more probable the Earth does move, than the Sun or Heavens.
Page: 321 (141)
[65.] PROP. X. That this Hypotheſis is exactly agreeable to common appearances.
Page: 342 (162)
[66.] Quicunq; ſolam mente præcipiti petit
Page: 360 (180)
[67.] Brevem replere non valentis ambitum, # Pudebit aucti nominis.
Page: 361 (181)
[68.] FINIS.
Page: 364 (184)
< >
page |< < (109) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div296" type="section" level="1" n="63">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4311" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="109" file="0289" n="289" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            thing, becauſe it was ſo in one thing: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4312" xml:space="preserve">And
              <lb/>
            this would be an excellent Argument to prove
              <lb/>
            that Opinion of Anaxagoras, that the Snow
              <lb/>
            was black.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4313" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4314" xml:space="preserve">The reaſon why that motion which is
              <lb/>
            cauſed by the Earth, does appear as if it
              <lb/>
            were in the Heavens, is, becauſe the ſenſus
              <lb/>
            communis, in judging of it, does conceive
              <lb/>
            the Eye to be it ſelf immovable, (as was
              <lb/>
            ſaid before) there being no ſenſe that does
              <lb/>
            diſcern the effects of any motion in the Bo-
              <lb/>
            dy; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4315" xml:space="preserve">and therefore, it does conclude every
              <lb/>
            thing to move, which it does perceive to
              <lb/>
            change its diſtance from it: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4316" xml:space="preserve">So that the
              <lb/>
            Clouds do not ſeem to move ſometimes,
              <lb/>
            when as notwithſtanding they are every
              <lb/>
            where carried about with our Earth, by ſuch
              <lb/>
            a ſwift revolution; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4317" xml:space="preserve">yet this can be no hin-
              <lb/>
            drance at all, why we may not judg aright
              <lb/>
            of their other particular Motions, for which
              <lb/>
            there is not the ſame reaſon. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4318" xml:space="preserve">Though to a
              <lb/>
            Man in a Ship, the Trees and Banks may
              <lb/>
            ſeem to move; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4319" xml:space="preserve">yet it would be but a weak
              <lb/>
            Argument, to conclude from thence, that
              <lb/>
            therefore ſuch a one could not tell whether
              <lb/>
            his Friend does really ſtir, whom he ſees to
              <lb/>
            walk up and down in the Ship: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4320" xml:space="preserve">or that he
              <lb/>
            might as well be deceived in judging the
              <lb/>
            Oars to move, when they do not.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4321" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4322" xml:space="preserve">’Tis again replied by the ſame Objector,
              <lb/>
            That it is not credible, the Eye ſhould be
              <lb/>
            miſtaken in judging of the Stars and Hea-
              <lb/>
            vens; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4323" xml:space="preserve">becauſe thoſe being light Bodies, are
              <lb/>
            the primary & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4324" xml:space="preserve">proper Objects of that Senſe.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4325" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum