Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

List of thumbnails

< >
201
201 (21)
202
202 (22)
203
203 (23)
204
204 (24)
205
205 (25)
206
206 (26)
207
207 (27)
208
208 (28)
209
209 (29)
210
210 (30)
< >
page |< < (97) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div274" type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4134" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="97" file="0277" n="277" rhead="That the Eartb may be a Planet."/>
            ſtance from the Earth, and no nearer or far-
              <lb/>
            ther. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4135" xml:space="preserve">And beſides, this Argument might as
              <lb/>
            well be urged againſt the Hypotheſis of Pto-
              <lb/>
            lomy or Tycbo, ſince the Stars, for ought
              <lb/>
            we know, might have been as ſerviceable to
              <lb/>
            us, if they had been placed far nearer than
              <lb/>
            either of thoſe Authors ſuppoſe them. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4136" xml:space="preserve">A-
              <lb/>
            gain, were there any force in ſuch a Conſe-
              <lb/>
            quence, it would as well conclude a great
              <lb/>
            improvidence of Nature, in making ſuch a
              <lb/>
            multitude of thoſe leſſer Stars, which have
              <lb/>
            lately been diſcovered by the Perſpective.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4137" xml:space="preserve">For to what purpoſe ſhould ſo many Lights
              <lb/>
            be created for the uſe of Man, ſince his Eyes
              <lb/>
            were not able to diſcern them? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4138" xml:space="preserve">So that our
              <lb/>
            diſability to comprehend all thoſe ends
              <lb/>
            which might be aimed at in the Works of
              <lb/>
            Nature, can be no ſufficient Argument to
              <lb/>
            prove their ſuperfluity. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4139" xml:space="preserve">Though Scripture
              <lb/>
            tells us, that theſe things were made for
              <lb/>
            our uſe, yet it does not tell us, that this is
              <lb/>
            their only end. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4140" xml:space="preserve">’Tis not impoſſible, but that
              <lb/>
            there may be elſewhere ſome other Inhabi-
              <lb/>
            tants, by whom theſe leſſer Stars may be
              <lb/>
            more plainly diſcerned. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4141" xml:space="preserve">And (as was ſaid
              <lb/>
            before) why may not we affirm that of the
              <lb/>
            bigneſs, which our Adverſaries do concern-
              <lb/>
            ing the motion of the Heavens? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4142" xml:space="preserve">That God,
              <lb/>
            to ſhew his own immenſity, did put a kind
              <lb/>
            of infinity in the Creature.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4143" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4144" xml:space="preserve">There is yet another Argument to this
              <lb/>
            purpoſe, urged by Al. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4145" xml:space="preserve">Roſſ. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4146" xml:space="preserve">which was
              <note symbol="*" position="right" xlink:label="note-0277-01" xlink:href="note-0277-01a" xml:space="preserve">Lib. I.
                <lb/>
              ſect. 2.6.I.</note>
            referred to any of the former kind, becauſe
              <lb/>
            I could ſcarcely believe I did rightly </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>