Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

List of thumbnails

< >
41
41 (29)
42
42 (30)
43
43 (31)
44
44 (32)
45
45 (33)
46
46 (34)
47
47 (35)
48
48 (36)
49
49 (37)
50
50 (38)
< >
page |< < (29) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div51" type="section" level="1" n="30">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s463" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="29" file="0041" n="41" rhead="That the Moon may be a World."/>
            you may ſee ſundry Diſcourſes more at large
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-01" xlink:href="note-0041-01a" xml:space="preserve">In opere 6.
                <lb/>
              dierum.
                <lb/>
              diſput. 5.
                <lb/>
              In lib. de
                <lb/>
              Mundi
                <lb/>
              conſtit.</note>
            in Ludovicus Molina, Euſebius Nirembergius,
              <lb/>
            with divers others. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s464" xml:space="preserve">The Venerable Bede
              <lb/>
            thought the Planets to conſiſt of all the four
              <lb/>
            Elements; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s465" xml:space="preserve">and ’tis likely that the other parts
              <lb/>
            are of an Aerous Subſtance, as will be ſhewed
              <lb/>
            after wards; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s466" xml:space="preserve">however, I cannot now ſtand to re-
              <lb/>
            cite the Arguments for either; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s467" xml:space="preserve">I have only
              <lb/>
            urged theſe Authorities to countervail Ariſtotle,
              <lb/>
            and the School-Men, and the better to make
              <lb/>
            way for a proof of their Corruptibility.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s468" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s469" xml:space="preserve">The next thing then to be enquir'd after, is,
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-02" xlink:href="note-0041-02a" xml:space="preserve">2 Pet. 3. 12</note>
            whether they be of a corruptible Nature, not
              <lb/>
            whether they can be deſtroyed of God; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s470" xml:space="preserve">for
              <lb/>
            this, Scripture puts out of doubt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s471" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s472" xml:space="preserve">Nor whether or no in a long time they
              <lb/>
            would wear away and grow worſe; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s473" xml:space="preserve">for from
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-03" xlink:href="note-0041-03a" xml:space="preserve">By Doctor
                <lb/>
              Hakewell.
                <lb/>
              Ap. l. lib. 2.</note>
            any ſuch Fear they have been lately priviledg-
              <lb/>
            ed. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s474" xml:space="preserve">But whether they are capable of ſuch
              <lb/>
            changes and viciſſitudes, as this inferiour
              <lb/>
            World is lyable unto?</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s475" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s476" xml:space="preserve">The two chief Opinions concerning this,
              <lb/>
            have both erred in ſome extremity, the one
              <lb/>
            ſide going ſo far from the other, that they
              <lb/>
            have both gone beyond the Right, whilſt
              <lb/>
            Ariſtotle hath oppos'd the Truth, as well as the
              <lb/>
            Stoicks.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s477" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s478" xml:space="preserve">Some of the Ancients have thought, that
              <lb/>
            the Heavenly Bodies have ſtood in need of
              <lb/>
              <note symbol="*" position="right" xlink:label="note-0041-04" xlink:href="note-0041-04a" xml:space="preserve">Plutarch
                <lb/>
              de plac.
                <lb/>
              philoſ. l. 2.
                <lb/>
              c. 17.
                <lb/>
              Nat. Hiſt.
                <lb/>
              l. 2. c. 9.
                <lb/>
              Nat. quæſt.
                <lb/>
              lib. 2. c. 5.</note>
            Nouriſhment from the Elements, by which
              <lb/>
            they were continually Fed, and ſo had divers
              <lb/>
            Alterations by reaſon of their Food?</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s479" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s480" xml:space="preserve">Fathered on Heraclitus, followed by that great
              <lb/>
            Naturaliſt Pliny, and in general attributed to all the Stoicks. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s481" xml:space="preserve">You may ſee Seneca </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>