Guevara, Giovanni di, In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii, 1627

List of thumbnails

< >
11
11 		12
12
13
13 		14
14
15
15 		16
16
17
17 		18
18
19
19 		20
20
< >
page |< < of 303 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N10019">
            <pb pagenum="91" xlink:href="005/01/099.jpg"/>
            <p id="N12BAD" type="head">
              <s id="N12BAF">COMMENTARIVS.</s>
            </p>
            <p id="N12BB3" type="main">
              <s id="N12BB5">Svpponit hic Ariſtoteles ab experientia, quod nos in­
                <lb/>
              fra ratione probabimus, remiges in nauis medio remi­
                <lb/>
              gantes, magis nauem mouere, quàm ſi in prora, vel
                <lb/>
              puppi remigarent, ſiue quàm alij, qui æquali conatu, ac vir­
                <lb/>
              tute ſimul remigant in alio ſitu. </s>
              <s id="N12BC0">
                <expan abbr="Cauſamq.">Cauſamque</expan>
              problematicè
                <lb/>
              ſciſcitando, vt ſolet præmittit, Remum vectem eſt, ſcal­
                <lb/>
              mum verò fulcimentum, & mare conſtitui pondus, quod per
                <lb/>
              remum propellitur à remige tanquam à vectem mouente.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s id="N12BCF">Deinde ſic argumentatur: Tanto magis mouens adhibito
                <lb/>
              vecte pondus mouet, quanto magis extremum vectis vbi
                <lb/>
              virtutem applicat diſtat a centro, ſeu fulcimento: At in
                <lb/>
              medio nauis, remi manubrium ſiue extremum, in quo vir­
                <lb/>
              tus remigis applicatur, magis diſtat à ſcalmo, qui conſtitui­
                <lb/>
              tur fulcimentum: Ergo magis pariter nauem mouebit re­
                <lb/>
              miger in illo ſitu, quàm in alio, vt in prora, vel puppi. </s>
              <s id="N12BDE">Quod
                <lb/>
              autem manubrium remi exiſtentis in medio nauis, magis
                <lb/>
              diſtet à ſcalmo, probat ex eo, quòd nauis in medio, latior
                <lb/>
              eſt, quàm verſus proram, vel puppim;
                <expan abbr="proindeq.">proindeque</expan>
              pars remi,
                <lb/>
              quæ intus eſt, ſiue vbi manubrium, longior pariter eſt iuxta
                <lb/>
              proportionem, quam habere debet cum ſitu. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N12BEF" type="main">
              <s id="N12BF1">Ex quo Ariſtoteles aliam quoque rationem deſumit,
                <lb/>
              quam cum priori (perobſcurè tamen) connectit: Quia ni­
                <lb/>
              mirum adhuc foris pars remi in medio nauis conſtituti, lon­
                <lb/>
              gior eſt iuxta proportionem prædictam, quæ ad commodi­
                <lb/>
              tatem remigationis ſemper ſeruatur in vſu. </s>
              <s id="N12BFC">Longior autem
                <lb/>
              remi pars externa, ſeu palmula, maiorem aquæ portionem
                <lb/>
              diuidit, ac propellit, magiſque propterea nauem promouet,
                <lb/>
              quàm quæ breuior eſt ratione proportionis, ac ſitus. </s>
              <s id="N12C05">Quare
                <lb/>
              obſeruandum eſt, eam eſſe debitam remorum proportio­
                <lb/>
              nem inter ſe, quæ eſt inter ſitum, & ſitum nauis vbi conſti­
                <lb/>
              tuuntur, ita vt vbi latior fuerit nauis, ibi productiores remi
                <lb/>
              conſtituantur ex vtraque parte ipſorum, quæ eſt vtrinque à
                <lb/>
              scalmo. </s>
              <s id="N12C12">Hoc eſt tam intus ex parte manubrij, quàm foris </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum