Biancani, Giuseppe, Aristotelis loca mathematica, 1615

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 91]
[Figure 92]
[Figure 93]
[Figure 94]
[Figure 95]
[Figure 96]
[Figure 97]
[Figure 98]
[Figure 99]
[Figure 100]
[Figure 101]
[Figure 102]
[Figure 103]
[Figure 104]
[Figure 105]
[Figure 106]
[Figure 107]
[Figure 108]
[Figure 109]
[Figure 110]
[Figure 111]
[Figure 112]
[Figure 113]
[Figure 114]
[Figure 115]
[Figure 116]
[Figure 117]
[Figure 118]
[Figure 119]
[Figure 120]
< >
page |< < of 355 > >|
1leos imprudens me conieci? rident enim hoc Ariſt. dictum Mathematici,
putant enim eum pueriliter lapſum eſſe.
Cæterum ego pro præceptoris tu­
tela, dico eum ſequutum eſſe famam.
hæc Mazonius, quorum nonnulla in­
digent conſideratione cuiuſmodi, ſunt illa, quando dicit, neceſſarium vi­
detur, quod ea pars ſupra eam regionem attollatur, vnde Crepuſculum in
planitie apparere incipit.
videtur enim his verbis velle dicere, quod quan­
do habitantibus planitiem, quæ eſt ad pedem montis Caucaſi, vel horizon­
tem eiuſdem, incipit Crepuſculum, ijſdem etiam tunc tertia montis pars
appareat illuminata; in quo ſenſu errat poſtea in colligenda montis altitu­
dine, quamuis enim verum eſſet partem illuminatam eminere totam ſupra
52. milliaria, non tamen ſequitur ipſam ſolam eminere, ſed alia etiam pars
eminere poteſt, quod ſic geometricè demonſtrabo.
deſcribatur enim figura
53[Figure 53]

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index